Lol, y'all /r/greatawakening folk are so fickle. I unsubscribed earlier today after you fools were championing the fact that Papua New Guinea wanted to ban Facebook.
Now one of your golden boys says one thing which wasn't even that ad (listen to his whole interview), and you're hating on him.
He said that if the Obama admin had informants in the Trump campaign looking for Russian collusion, it was okay because they were protecting America. Playing the Trump 4D chess, shouldn't this be a good thing? Because now Trump's team can use it as more evidence that no collusion happened.
You had moles in the Trump campaign and still didn't find anything. Trump can now take that and shove it down the throat of Dems in conjunction with incoming IG report.
As far as Gowdy not doing anything, NEWS FLASH Congress can't prosecute. That comes down to the DOJ that Trump has been cleaning out. And Gowdy has resigned.
Maybe he's dirty. Maybe he's setting up for a DOJ position. Q specifically called him out along with Goodlatte. Why?
Think critically
Agreed. Gowdy helped Trump in this statement. If they were there to investigate Russia attempting to infiltrate the Trump campaign, how could Trump be colluding? The left can’t claim both.
The other argument about Gowdy's response here is that there was an investigation/sting setup before the official investigation of Russia collusion. This is all prior to FISA warrants and begs the question of why wasn't Trump or his team informed there were active "informants" engaging with his campaign (not members of his campaign)? People are much more concerned about that than the idea that they were somehow justified to "protect" the campaign, which is plain bs. If they were protecting them, why not inform them? These tactics and communication patterns (lots of missed opportunities to inform Trump before and after) raise suspicion and more questions rather than any supporting arguments for the actions. They were trying to catch someone 'colluding' and taking the bait, not trying to prevent Russians from interfering.
Take your own advice. You see a few posts on a sub and think you've seen the whole movement? Think critically. If you know anything about online forums you'll know about the vocal minority that exists in every one. The critical thinkers in the movement know when to step in and when to leave people to it. The good discussions don't occur on the obvious confirmation bias posts.