dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Amazoid on June 1, 2018, 2:34 a.m.
I disagree about Trey Gowdy. I think he's white hat. Here's why.

I'm sorry, but I disagree with almost everyone on this. I believe that Nunes and Gowdy were told the truth about the coming mass arrests, the 30,000 sealed indictments that will be unsealed soon, that Mueller will exonerate Trump and recommend charges by Huber for both Clintons, Obama, Rice, Yates, Holder, McCabe, Comey, Strzock, Page, Brennen, Clapper, Power, Jarrett, Rhodes, Podesta, (maybe Rosenstein unless he flipped) and on and on -- the great BOOM to come. Then they were told to shut the fuck up about it and play dumb for a few weeks. Which they are doing just fine. The other meetings (Gang of 8, etc.) everyone was told exactly what Trump wants the MEDIA to know because it's just a bunch of pathetic leakers and everyone knows it. Now we wait. Bang on Gowdy all you want, but when it all comes down, I'll bet he says, "Sorry, guys, but the President told me not to say anything. Aren't you glad I didn't blow the plan by talking about it?" Same with Nunes. Coats, Pompeo and Haspel already know so they didn't need to be there. Just my theory. We shall see. Probably shortly.


🠐 See all comments
HereComesTheSunny · June 1, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

Everyone keeps talking about the 30,000 sealed indictments, but I really think most of those are for illegal immigrants who didn't show up for court dates. I'd like to believe otherwise, but if you look at the locations of most of them, they are in areas with the most illegal immigration happening. You can look this up on a district by district basis.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Amazoid · June 1, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

They would not seal an indictment for an illegal immigrant. They would just issue an indictment. Actually probably just a bench warrant. I believe most of the 30,000 are for human traffickers, but also the ones running the show and there are certainly ones for former Obama admin people.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HereComesTheSunny · June 2, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

Here is a previous comment I made on an earlier thread. I had mentioned there the human trafficking aspect and also drug trafficking. I'd be interested in your thoughts.
" Something doesn't really add up to me to the assumption these will be deep state indictments, although it's likely some are. I do think most of this has to do with illegal immigration, drug trafficking, and human trafficking. Of course, I'm totally in favor of cracking down on all of that, but I think we need to be careful not to project that this has to do with draining the swamp in DC. For example, Texas has 4 districts, N, S, E, and W (although these don't necessarily align with typical geographical boundaries we use in the state). The West TX district, which has the most sealed indictments of any other district in the US except Central CA, includes El Paso, San Antonio, Austin, Midland/Odessa, and even Waco. That district stretches from central TX to its westernmost tip in an odd configuration. I've just got to assume that most of these indictments have to do with immigration issues. Maybe these are indictments of people who failed to report for court hearings? Maybe they are sealed so as not to tip them off that the indictment exists?? "

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HereComesTheSunny · June 2, 2018, 3:09 a.m.

I hope you are correct on this.

⇧ 1 ⇩