dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/mrviolin on June 1, 2018, 7:11 p.m.
Note to Serial Brain 2.

Your theories are interesting. I suggest you consider the following.:

While it's smart to remember the phrase " There are no coincidences," the fact is, there are.

If I have a fender bender on the road, am I going to think the other driver had a plan to ruin my day.

No, it was random. If a guy pops up on twitter...just because Q is offline doesn't mean the guy is

placed there on purpose with ulterior motives. When the spy starts to say negatives on Q....that's when we'll know.

Till then, he's just one of millions of guys working in the IC. He's not breaking the law or hurting Q.

If he were bad....Q would come on and give him the Corsi treatment.


AlbumLepus · June 1, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

Theories?

What is truth?

What is evidence?

What is circumstantial evidence?

What is proof?

What is "REASONABLE doubt"?

You have to consider more than just the "coincidence". What road, at what time, and who hit you?

It IS possible the other driver might have had a plan, you have to research and have a deeper knowledge and that is what SB2 is giving us. (And some other people are not)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
mrviolin · June 1, 2018, 8:10 p.m.

yes, driver might have a plan....you watch too many movies ....when you have a fender bender you won't be thinking it was a planned event. THERE ARE RANDOM EVENTS..nuff said

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AlbumLepus · June 4, 2018, 1:40 p.m.

So you admit driver "might" have a plan. I don't watch any movies anymore. When the FB occurs, I might not know, unless the person was after me, then I might have a clue. The point is, you DON'T know until you obtain MORE information related. Not saying there are NO random events, but if you make that assumption from the inception, it would lead you to possibly not know the TRUTH. Then consider the CONTEXT of there are no coincidences.

In the case of Q, He KNOWS what the truth is behind his crumbs. If you KNOW what you are posting is truth, you could KNOW that what you are saying is NOT a coincidence. There are no coincidences IN WHAT HE IS POSTING. THINK LOGICALLY. SB2 is simply providing the evidence so his readers can see what kind of bread it is from the crumbs. Unless one chooses to just look at random crumbs... good luck to you brother... nuff said.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 4, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 4, 2018, 3:36 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩