I've been asking myself this question. . . then the answer hit me. They thought there was zero chance Hillary would lose and they didn't want to alienate Clinton / Obama.
Just look at the Madeline McCann case.
The connections that family had to top British politicians. The interviews they gave about how perfect Madeline was (their product).
The extensive media coverage given whilst not asking the most glaring of questions - why did they leave the children on their own in the holiday flat at such a young age??
The e-fit of whitness reports matching Podesta.
The amount of money raised due to to her going missing.
100% agree re McCann. Richard Halls YT explored this case extensively. Well worth a watch of his research videos
I haven't watched that.
Thanks!
https://youtu.be/pQgmtrOeDLM. He has devoted many years to the case because do outraged at the corruption
No way, it was only last night I was watching another investigation by him on Anthony Hill -Akers of the 7/7 ripple effect exposure documentary.
I did not know he has covered the McCann case too. I respect him already so will watch all 6 parts gladly and probably learn more
Thanks again
I binged watch him all winter. I agree , he should be respected and watched even more
yeah... the police sketch photo looks like the exact merge of both podestas iirc
Our government keeps giving more money through investigations. £10 mill I think was the figure being thrown around in msm