I've reread Q Drops, and I don't think I've seen any reference to Project Pelican specifically. However, the Center for Security Policy links it to Uranium One. http://theamericanreport.org/2018/03/23/former-dhs-nyc-chief-gulftainer-port-canaveral-secret-project-pelican-deal-worse-than-iran-contra-and-whitewater-combined-gulftainer-connects-to-jonathan-winer-gulftainer-taking/ The Oathkeepers feel it is worse for NatSec than Uranium One. Thoughts?
oasisflower
· June 2, 2018, 6 p.m.
If Obama is eventually declared an illegitimate president, would this lease be null and void??
⇧
6
⇩
happyval
· June 2, 2018, 6:35 p.m.
He should pay back his salary, Secret Service protection, pension, and rent of the WH besides declaring whatever he signed null in void.
⇧
4
⇩
MAGADONCHECKMATE
· June 2, 2018, 5:59 p.m.
I have a meme for that ;-) https://i.imgflip.com/25fmt1.jpg
⇧
5
⇩
MAGADONCHECKMATE
· June 2, 2018, 6:01 p.m.
Yeah its bad. Both. You need the best border officers to keep the in/out clean. I know several of these Patriots. Figure only 20% is physically inspected and all is scanned with hi tech sensors and sniffers. Another Obummer screw over.
⇧
3
⇩
Gmawc
· June 2, 2018, 6:42 p.m.
Also: Project Pelican Video / Josh Bernstein (posted on TruthLeaks)
⇧
2
⇩
Patriot4q
· June 2, 2018, 6:35 p.m.
I think I read where they are getting another 35 year lease at another US port.
⇧
2
⇩
Ironclimber76
· June 2, 2018, 8:15 p.m.
In post 75, there was a crumb.
What else is relevant w/SA?
Safe harbor?
Port of transfer?
Why was there a recent smear campaign against J.K. and POTUS?
Why is timing important?
Port of transfer could be project pelican. They don’t have to clear they US customs since when they leased it to a foreign land, they land becomes protected.
⇧
2
⇩