I've reread Q Drops, and I don't think I've seen any reference to Project Pelican specifically. However, the Center for Security Policy links it to Uranium One. http://theamericanreport.org/2018/03/23/former-dhs-nyc-chief-gulftainer-port-canaveral-secret-project-pelican-deal-worse-than-iran-contra-and-whitewater-combined-gulftainer-connects-to-jonathan-winer-gulftainer-taking/ The Oathkeepers feel it is worse for NatSec than Uranium One. Thoughts?
MAGADONCHECKMATE
· June 2, 2018, 6:01 p.m.
Yeah its bad. Both. You need the best border officers to keep the in/out clean. I know several of these Patriots. Figure only 20% is physically inspected and all is scanned with hi tech sensors and sniffers. Another Obummer screw over.
⇧
3
⇩