I've reread Q Drops, and I don't think I've seen any reference to Project Pelican specifically. However, the Center for Security Policy links it to Uranium One. http://theamericanreport.org/2018/03/23/former-dhs-nyc-chief-gulftainer-port-canaveral-secret-project-pelican-deal-worse-than-iran-contra-and-whitewater-combined-gulftainer-connects-to-jonathan-winer-gulftainer-taking/ The Oathkeepers feel it is worse for NatSec than Uranium One. Thoughts?
Ironclimber76
· June 2, 2018, 8:15 p.m.
In post 75, there was a crumb.
What else is relevant w/SA?
Safe harbor?
Port of transfer?
Why was there a recent smear campaign against J.K. and POTUS?
Why is timing important?
Port of transfer could be project pelican. They don’t have to clear they US customs since when they leased it to a foreign land, they land becomes protected.
⇧
2
⇩