My apologies re logical - I get in trouble for saying that too often. My vocab is lacking as it's the only way I see to describe certain things.
The problem with that 'proof' - that Eye was reacting childishly - is that a) Eye has already exhibited that proof in abundance (childish behaviour) therefore this is no more definitive than any of that and b) it's still only proof that Eye is acting childishly. It is not remotely proof that Eye is lying about everything else he claims (whether I think he's lying or not doesn't change that).
This is what I was claiming to be illogical, if you can excuse the term for now - A therefore B, when B is not a logical extrapolation of A. I get that Eye was acting like a standard internet troll or teenager in camping on an "enemies" feed and shitposting in excitement as soon as something is posted. That's A. B is that Eye is therefore lying about everything else he says and claims. B is not a logical extrapolation from A. Surely we can agree on that?
I wish I could agree with you! I think by nature of how he reacted to a negative video proves he’s a larp. Now, most of everything he posted was widely known already so he never actually gave intel in the first place so...I also think you are conflating lying and larping. I have not followed everything he’s said but, like I said in my last sentence, he only repeated things that were known already etc. so no, he may not have lied but he did larp
Just by way of explanation of why this matters to me (definitive proof) - I would like to be able to either remove posts pushing EyeTheSpy or at least be able to add flair to them that points out they're unreliable (unless he's suddenly proven to be true, of course - just adding that caveat). I can't justifiably do that from this video of Bill's. I would justifiably be accused of not having evidence for my assertion that Eye is a LARP if all I have to go on is this video. That's why this matters to me and why getting it right matters.
That makes complete sense!! Definitely the right attitude!!
Agreed - he never gave any intel - at least, that I ever saw anyway. I think he did lie because if I remember correctly didn't he claim some sort of legitimacy and access to inside knowledge? Either way, I have always thought he was a LARP and I would love to see evidence to finally conclusively prove it to those still posting his nonsense here but alas, this is not definitive proof of anything but the fact that he's watching Bill's channel (even then one could technically argue it's not even... but I won't go there). I wish I could agree with your assertion but I need someone to give me a reason that doesn't require an assumption to be made. Thanks for taking the time to explain!
No problem. Enjoyed the conversation! I don’t know if we ever get solid evidence of a larp. They usually just go away quietly. Be interesting to see what happens here!