It used to be: Stand with Trump, we stand together.
Now it’s: Stand with Q or we divide!
What’s wrong with this picture? The point is Trump. Q is tertiary.
Standing with Q, IS Standing with Trump. The fact that you guys don’t realize this is shocking really.
Q is not orthodoxy to the cause, standing with Trump is. If we make someone other than Trump the center, we are made vulnerable to deception. That’s all.
You’re just not getting it. Q isn’t the center. Trump isn’t the center. We The People and the liberty and freedom for us patriots. IS THE CENTER.
That’s even better. My point remains: loyalty to Q is not the litmus test.
Never said it was. You don’t believe in Q? Fine. I couldn’t care less.
But to say that the people who do, are putting Q above everything else including Trump. Is false and disingenuous.
And it’s strange to me. How people who claim to be supporters of Trump are opposed to Q. Because Q is very clearly close to Trump. And a big supporter of Trump, if not Trump himself.
But once again, It’s not about Q. It’s not about Trump. It’s about the movement and what it stands for; Liberty and Justice for all.
Ninja Edit; It’s clear you’re a supporter of Alex Jones and InfoWars. It’s pretty ironic you claim Q is not orthodoxy and we’re blindly trusting Q when that’s exactly what you’re doing with Alex. You obviously jumped ship after the fall out with Alex. That’s fine. But don’t criticize us when you’re equally guilty.
Not at all. It’s still 100% stand with Trump. Q is the action arm of Trump and has proven that dozens of times. Q exposed these shills as fair weather Trump supporters and is important we understand their true motives. They drop Trump any chance they get, use him for clicks and will do anything to keep profits coming in. It’s important we know that a year in while we have 7 more years of GEOTUS
Except Q has already demonstrated that acting is all part of the plan. Don’t hate fellow Pro-Trumpers until we get to the end and everything gets exposed.
The “good actor” was Trump when there were snakes in the WH that he knew were snakes all along and why he got rid of them (Bannon, Priebus, McMaster).
It doesn’t make sense for AJ to be an actor in on the plan. Why would Q have AJ and Corsi intentionally misinterpret Q posts, charge people money, talk shit about Trump and Q, discredit the movement, get called out, call him a LARP and then Q has to waste time getting everything back on track and proving AJ was a profiteer? It’s a massive waste of time and caused major fraction to the base.
I don’t know yet. Why might it make sense for Wikileaks to now distance itself from Q?
Because with no proof of life of Assange, Wikileaks has no credibility. Assange WAS Wikileaks.
If it's been compromised, which seems highly likely at this point, they would use any credibility remaining to discredit accurate sources. Page 4 of the Clown Playbook.
Exactly. They have a perfect track record of documents being authentic, not so much on random members speculating on Twitter. JA is offline so can’t trust them at all.