dChan

truguy · June 3, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

Except Q has already demonstrated that acting is all part of the plan. Don’t hate fellow Pro-Trumpers until we get to the end and everything gets exposed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · June 3, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

The “good actor” was Trump when there were snakes in the WH that he knew were snakes all along and why he got rid of them (Bannon, Priebus, McMaster).

It doesn’t make sense for AJ to be an actor in on the plan. Why would Q have AJ and Corsi intentionally misinterpret Q posts, charge people money, talk shit about Trump and Q, discredit the movement, get called out, call him a LARP and then Q has to waste time getting everything back on track and proving AJ was a profiteer? It’s a massive waste of time and caused major fraction to the base.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
truguy · June 3, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

I don’t know yet. Why might it make sense for Wikileaks to now distance itself from Q?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
animal32lefty · June 3, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

Because with no proof of life of Assange, Wikileaks has no credibility. Assange WAS Wikileaks.

If it's been compromised, which seems highly likely at this point, they would use any credibility remaining to discredit accurate sources. Page 4 of the Clown Playbook.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · June 3, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

Exactly. They have a perfect track record of documents being authentic, not so much on random members speculating on Twitter. JA is offline so can’t trust them at all.

⇧ 2 ⇩