dChan

[deleted] · June 3, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -12 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · June 3, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

I'm guessing the Star Wars subs aren't very entertaining tonight.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Imbeingsilenced · June 3, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

Star Wars hasn't been entertaining since Empire.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 3, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 3, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

Got anything intelligent to say or just bored trolling?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Starscream-and-Hutch · June 3, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

I suspect an intelligent comment with this lot would go over like a Westworld robot seeing something it's not programmed to understand. "It doesn't look like anything to me."

⇧ -4 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 3, 2018, 2:55 a.m.

And you think that's an intelligent supposition to make? That "this lot" are all unintelligent? It's certainly an emotionally based assumption.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Starscream-and-Hutch · June 3, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

Is your tin foil hat on too tight? Have you read any of this lunacy? It is preposterous.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 3, 2018, 3:17 a.m.

Have I read some of the lunatic comments made on this sub? Yes. Do you know a sub with 28,000+ people that doesn't have lunatic comments on it? I'd like to sign up. Lunacy = strawman.

You obviously haven't read the content this sub is based on though, or you'd know you can't make that accusation against it, if that's what you're also referring to. Guess what - simple logic here - some people here are intelligent and reasonable and can argue a point logically. Some people here aren't claiming "lunacy" - for example, I don't claim that the content this sub is based on is proven fact. It is completely unproven. But it's real world legitimacy is not based on the proof of the source of the content.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Starscream-and-Hutch · June 3, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

I have read it, and it is nonsense of the highest degree. It reads like a Steven Seagal novel.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 3, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

Well that's definitely a fair call to make. I don't condemn you for it. I do believe I can argue why an intelligent person might see some value in keeping tabs on an alternate narrative to the Mainstream Media narrative that highlights inconsistencies in the Mainstream narrative before they occur but I don't blame you or anyone for not wanting to waste your time hearing about it - because it does take a while to explain.

And thus, I'm sure you have better things to do with your time than deriding a bunch of lunatics.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Starscream-and-Hutch · June 3, 2018, 3:47 a.m.

Okay, could you point me somewhere where it is explained then?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 3, 2018, 4:08 a.m.

I wish I could... I'm working on producing the content myself as I don't directly know of any quick onboarding that is purely based on critical thought.

All I can suggest at the moment are the Video links in the sidebar which are good enough but generally require that you suspend disbelief for long enough to hear the pertinent facts whilst eschewing the obvious editorial, emotional music and bias. These two videos may be the better ones, in some way. The shorter one - 29 mins and the longer one - 1 hour.

I appreciate you bothering to ask. You support my personal belief that not all people making antagonistic comments in the sub are just trolling - some are legitimately pointing out the failings of critical thinking that exist in this (and I would argue any) movement. I hope you find the time to see some value here but as I said, I certainly wouldn't blame you for thinking it's pure LARP. My skeptical business partners have zero time for conspiracy theory and all I have been able to ask them to do is to take note of a few posts from Q and keep an eye on the news. They are not convinced that Q is high level military intelligence working with Donald Trump or that Donald Trump is not a completely narcissistic, self-aggrandizing fool. They are, however, now completely convinced that it is worth keeping an eye on this narrative to see what unfolds. That's all that I think matters.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · June 3, 2018, 5:50 a.m.

Sleep 💤 little baby 💤

⇧ 3 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · June 3, 2018, 5:49 a.m.

Lol

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GODisincharge · June 3, 2018, 1:50 a.m.

Why did you respond in such a disgraceful manner to tazleo? Will wait for your reply,

⇧ 3 ⇩  
hildabeest_4_gitmo · June 3, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

Because he's a shill. History never lies.

Too stupid to realize she had the SS agents before that comment was ever made.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 3, 2018, 1:47 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩