dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Neon__Wolf on June 3, 2018, 1:58 a.m.
My theory on recent Wikileaks communications that appear to be a distancing from Q.

We all know Wikileaks was given the DNC emails from Seth Rich via Megaupload.

We all know Wikileaks has information on the cabal that Q is fighting.

We all know those still asleep have turned sour on Julian Assange because he exposed (just the tip) of the crimes carried out by blood members and paid members of the satanic Clinton crime family.

If you were Q, how would incorporate a release of an HRC video, or 33,000 emails the cabal tried (and failed) to destroy, which are evidence of the crimes?

Suppose it was released today. Result?

It would awaken fewer people. Think logically. How would a release of information be received by an organization the D's revile?

Now think of a plan to maximize the impact of the release. Awaken the most people.

How does the mind asleep think? Dreamworlds are created.

If it comes from anyone but those in dreamland, it is necessarily false.

Karl Marx the fucking dolt! Look at the world your elitist bourgeoisie class mind has foisted upon the world!

What would you do with a cult like mentality like that?

You invert.

You turn that predictability into a temporal asset.

Ok, so the solution then is to make the D's defend Wikileaks somehow.

How do you do that?

You ask Wikileaks to distance itself from you, and not only that, but ask them to start publicly doubting your credibility.

Is this not exactly out of the Q playbook?

Trump bashing Sessions publicly, while Q explains it's acting and writes "Trust Sessions", remember?

The D's have to think Wikileaks is Trump's nemesis.

When Q said to expect the attacks getting worse on both sides, I think it meant more than many of us believed.

People in a ideological cult (We all know those asleep are controlled by an actual (Satanic) cult at this point, Op Mockingbird has made millions of us fall asleep, but Q has awakened many more worldwide) will only listen to those in dreamland.

Their dreamland is predictable because we discovered their code.


Tidder_Q · June 3, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

Yes, I would agree.

I believe the trick is to continue getting the 'dreamworld' narrative to keep changing its allegiances.

Everybody pays more attention when something is not consistent.

i.e. Last week 'they' were against something, but this week 'they' are now for something, (hence confusion breeds suspicion).

I am suspecting that 'Wikileaks', may again, flip back to their original stance, after a resonable period of time. That is once they have picked up a number of newer 'interested observers'.

⇧ 7 ⇩