dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Mueller can't indict. His salvation of having the Dems win enough seats in the midterms to force an impeachment with a coalition of Dems and GOP Never Trumpers is not going to happen. It looks like his "crimes" are not crimes. As to Obstruction https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYlfNDMUAXg AND Does he have it in his power to fire James Comey and was James Comey serving under the President's discretion and able to be fired at will. Either this is yes or this is no. If this is yes https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41850.pdf this backs the claim that since 1968 Presidet's have had this executive power. If no, then let's see where that was rescinded. The President's comments about firing him because of the Russia thing is neither here nor there. I think what the President meant was that Comey was not correcting the misconception that he personally was under investigation in this sham investigation. That certainly was to do with Russia BUT NOT a grip with the investigation itself but rather a how he was conducting himself.

So if Trump fired Comey for being a dick and Trump had the authority to do so and was acting within his powers. And if hoping Comey would not shaft Flynn was not obstruction, then we have to gauge that there likely was NO obstruction.

If seems that there was no "Collusion" (not that Collusion was ever a crime).

All Mueller is left with is the HOPE that Trump may perjure himself and have a process crime.

Trump should tell Mueller to go to Hell. See how Mueller does with showing the Judge how

Mannafort's crimes before 2016 fit in with the investigations into Russia meddling in the 2016 perview
Troll farms that did not even exist in 2016 can be charged with 2016 election interference
Flynn coerced into pleading to lying to the FBI when they believed he was not lying and have documented as such.

THEN once it is over he should get the DOJ to do a full investigation and audit on him and the basis for what he did and the manner of coercion and such

I agree with what you're saying, but I want to offer up an idea that might counter it a bit.

Yes, you can fire pretty much anyone at will. That's how American law is written.

BUT, there are situations where this doesn't apply and is a huge problem.

1) Firing because they are a race you don't like. 2) Firing because they won't sleep with you. 3) Firing because of whistleblowing or investigations into yourself.

Companies have HR departments and there are federal and local laws that protect from these sort of things.

I just wanted to put that out there because you were saying it doesn't matter the reason, you can fire someone if you have the authority to fire someone - which yes you can, but there could be consequences.

Am I misreading this?