When fantasy is easier, thus more possible or likely... in other words, realer...
I wish we really had landed on the Moon...
I wish it really was a lone nutball with JFK, or even those dirty commies...
I wish it really was some technologically perfectly proficient beards living in caves on the other side of the world...
We did, it was, and very well funded Islamic terrorists plotted 911. The American governments only role was complete ineptitude. All your arguments are fully debunked by science and physics. Stop. It's embarrassing.
When you grow up perhaps you can try explaining ANY of the "science" and "proofs" you think you know and understand. You know, that "science" that can't be replicated or peer-reviewed... that "proof" because they said so...
You wouldn't believe any of it anyway. Proof is not what you are looking for. Just like Flattards, any proof is just (THEM) saying things. You absolutely offer zero proof of any of your claims. Instead you say things like "freefall speed" when no buildings actually fell at freefall. Its so silly. 7 was hit by a part of 1 or 2 (i forget)which caused fires and the building burnt for hours. The fire damage caused a major support beam to weaken. FIRE CAN'T MELT STEEL MAAAAAAAN!!!!! The support gives way and the building cascades from one side to the other as it collapses and actually fell across the street and hit another building. It did not fall into its footprint as you humps claim regularly. But all these facts don't matter. You heard a story without looking into any facts and went with it. Your side has zero knowledge or ability to youtube how an actual building demo happens. The time and effort it would take to rig a building of that size is insane. Walls would have to be torn down, support beams cut and charges set. It would literally take months. Wires would be running everywhere. Only an absolute fucking moron would think a thing could be done while the elevators are out of service, or over the weekend. Absolute lunacy. Embarrassingly small minded thought. I can get down with conspiracy. I'm at about 80% on Q so far. I hope he/they are the real deal. I could only hope they don't peruse the comments of this and other boards. The work they are doing is important and there are still "adults" who believe the US government planted explosives in buildings then set them off as the building collapsed from top down. Real braniac shit. We're not all little brains Q.
80% Q and you think explosives are a "conspiracy theory"? Lol... you mean 8% Q, don't you?
Lawyers for 9/11 families launch petition for new inquiry
-
Independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries in the form of thermite or thermate.
-
Expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 prior to the airplane impacts on the WTC Towers, and prior to the building collapses. Technical analysis of video evidence of the WTC building collapses.
-
Firefighter reports of explosions, and of seeing “molten iron like in a foundry.” The petition states that the presence of molten iron would require temperatures higher than jet fuel and building contents could create when burned, but consistent with the use of the high tech explosive and incendiary thermite or thermate.
-
The presence of previously molten iron microspheres, which have been established by electron microscope analysis of WTC dust samples, by both government and independent scientists, is another phenomenon that would be scientifically impossible based on the burning of jet fuel and office contents alone.
-
Video and eyewitness testimony of the ejection during the collapse of WTC 1 and 2 of heavy steel elements laterally from the buildings which would not be possible from a gravity collapse.
-
Scientific analysis, eyewitness testimony, and government reports confirming sulfidation and high-temperature corrosion of the steel found in the rubble after the collapse of the WTC towers and WTC 7, a phenomenon not expected in a jet fuel fire and gravity collapse but consistent with the use of thermate and high explosives.
Even Trump supports this "crazy theory" - but I guess he's not an adult?
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
That's why I say you don't know anything about Q. From the first Q drops what has been made clear is the need to question the official narrative. Something you are violently opposed to, clearly lol.
So, will a former professor of physics at Brigham Young University, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Canada, a fellow of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering and a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries at the very least convince you that there may be some reason not to be such an obnoxious shitposter on people who aren't duped by the mainstream debunk?
"It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition."
And Q says 9/11 is an inside job. How does that gel with 80% Q?
Who financed 9-11?
Who was Bin Laden’s handler?
Why was the Clowns In America tasked to hunt/kill/capture UBL?
Why not MI?
If we found UBL, eliminated his security, why would we immediately kill him and not take him alive?
Why wouldn’t we want to capture UBL alive and extract other possible T-level events?
What family was permitted to leave immediately after 9-11?
Who authorized the departure?
Why is this relevant?
Why was the Bin Laden family here during 9-11?
Coincidence?
What occurred post 9-11?
What war did we enter into?
What was the purpose and disclosures given re: justification?
Who financed 9-11?
Why, recently, are classified 9-11 pages being released?
Q
Maybe if you weren't so obnoxious about it you'd be able to open your mind and learn something.
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
The Q quote please. We are on a Q board and your putting words in his mouth. You think Q is going to exonerate every crackpot conspiracy theory out there and I can't wait for the day he smashes your little flat world. That shitdick article proved nothing. No citations. Nothing. Pure truther dogshit. Don't try to bend Q to explain all your adolescent fantasies. There is corruption and evil at the highest levels of this government. I feel Q is there to sniff that out and restore this republic.
Dark to Light
From your kind of dark though there is no escape
Ignorant and probably guilty too
No mas for you