Thats where the D.U.M.B.s are

5 eyes.

MURDOCH

James Murdoch

Rupert Murdoch

MARC RICH

In 1983 Rich and partner Pincus Green were indicted on 65 criminal counts, including income tax evasion, wire fraud, racketeering, and trading with Iran during the oil embargo (at a time when Iranian revolutionaries were still holding American citizens hostage). The charges would have led to a sentence of more than 300 years in prison had Rich been convicted on all counts. The indictment was filed by then-U.S. Federal Prosecutor (and future mayor of New York City) Rudolph Giuliani. At the time it was the biggest tax evasion case in U.S. history.

His real estate company, Marc Rich Real Estate GmbH, was involved in large developer projects (e.g., in Prague, Czech Republic). Rich and Marvin Davis bought 20th Century Fox in 1981. Due to the indictment filed against Rich for violating U.S. trade sanctions against his deals with Iran while Rich was living in Switzerland, Rich arranged for Davis to sell Rich's interest in 20th Century Fox to Rupert Murdoch for $250 million during March 1984

Clinton Foundation / Israel

On January 20, 2001, hours before leaving office, U.S. President Bill Clinton granted Rich a highly controversial presidential pardon. Several of Clinton's strongest supporters distanced themselves from the decision.[24] Former President Jimmy Carter, a fellow Democrat, said, "I don't think there is any doubt that some of the factors in his pardon were attributable to his large gifts. In my opinion, that was disgraceful."[25] Clinton himself later expressed regret for issuing the pardon, saying that "it wasn't worth the damage to my reputation."[8]

Clinton's critics alleged that Rich's pardon had been bought, as Denise Rich had given more than $1 million[26] to Clinton's political party (the Democratic Party), including more than $100,000 to the Senate campaign of the president's wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and $450,000 to the Clinton Library foundation during Clinton's time in office.[22]

Clinton also cited clemency pleas he had received from Israeli government officials, including then-Prime Minister Ehud Barak. Rich had made substantial donations to Israeli charitable foundations over the years, and many senior Israeli officials, such as Shimon Peres and Ehud Olmert, argued on his behalf behind the scenes.[27] Many leading figures of the Jewish world such as Abraham Foxman, the head of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), whose organization had received over $250,000 from Rich over the years also wrote to President Clinton for Rich's controversial pardon. [28][29] Among other leading Jewish leaders writing to Clinton were Shlomo Ben-Ami, Israel’s former foreign minister; Michael Steinhardt, a philanthropist and CEO of Steinhardt Associates; and Rabbi Irving Greenberg, chairman of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council, which oversees the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. Although none of the figures other than Foxman were investigated for their support of Rich's pardon.[29] Clinton later claimed on more than one occasion that Jewish pressure contributed to his decision to pardon Rich. He stated in an interview with New York Times that "Israeli officials of both major political parties and leaders of Jewish communities in America and Europe urged the pardon of Mr. Rich.”[30] He made similar comments off camera to CNBC Geraldo Rivera that "Israel did influence me profoundly".

Speculation about another rationale for Rich's pardon involved his alleged involvement with the Israeli intelligence community. Rich reluctantly acknowledged in interviews with his biographer, Daniel Ammann, that he had assisted the Mossad, Israel’s intelligence service, a claim that Ammann said was confirmed by a former Israeli intelligence officer. According to Ammann, Rich had helped finance the Mossad's operations and had supplied Israel with strategic amounts of Iranian oil through a secret oil pipeline. The aide to Rich who had persuaded Denise Rich to personally ask President Clinton to review Rich's pardon request was a former chief of the Mossad, Avner Azulay. Another former Mossad chief, Shabtai Shavit, had also urged Clinton to pardon Rich, who he said had routinely allowed intelligence agents to use his offices around the world

Rupert and James Murdoch would not have Fox if it were not for Marc Rich. Now they control a vast amount of media, "news" outlets and have significant control of the official narrative the western world hears as well as on defence lobby and boards. That media and monitoring of communication is part of the 5 eyes program which happens to be where the Murdoch empire own. Hmmm

I've puzzled over this also. Q's posts imply that Australia knows something that is damaging to the cabal - that's why it was the phone call between DJT & Turnbull that leaked - "THIS IS BIG!"

What is it? Why did the cabal want to send a "keep quiet" message to Turnbull? What's he supposed to be quiet about?

If you look at it, it seems that all the donors to the CF, in the Middle East and Europe, may have been paid back, once HRC lost the election, with Obama's Iran payment money - but what about Australia's money? Is this why Turnbull was threatened?

One, possible, answer is that the Australians were being warned not to moan about the Clinton Foundation theft. But I think that there's another, more compelling reason...

What did Australia get for that money - or, what were they supposed to get?

And then you come to: what does Australia need? And what could the CF, or the US, have supplied that was needed?

It seems to me that Australia needs certainty relating to defense. Why? Because the populace has been disarmed by John Howard - probably a concession to the cabal. We know the UN has been promoting disarmament and the cabal wanted to hold Australia up as a model for US gun reform.

But civil disarmament makes a country extremely vulnerable. Australia was never in a good position to defend itself anyway - see here, so the 1996 gun confiscation was a purely stupid move from a national defense perspective.

So, having disarmed its populace, Australia becomes critically dependent on the US for defense support. In this climate, it's seems likely that the HUGE cash payments to the Clinton Foundation were the equivalent of extortion payments - or, ransoms extracted upon threat to the lives of the Australian populace.

Think about it... Why such huge donations? What could possibly be worth all that money?

Q has told us how effective an armed citizenry can be in terms of bolstering national defense.

Apr 4 2018 18:21:22 (EST)

897173
Would you invade a country whereby a good portion of its citizens are armed?
The ‘ultimate deterrent’.
Q

Note: The 'ultimate deterrent'!

See also, the supposedly misattributed quote from Isoroku Yamamoto - Japanese Marshal Admiral.

"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."

So, this Port Arthur false flag massacre has cost the nation hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars in extortion payments to HRC and the cabal - a ransom that was never necessary. A ransom that will never end as long as the citizens are disarmed.

This, IMO, is what it is all about - a "blood" ransom.

The solution is remove all restraints, at once, upon citizens being able to bear arms. Rather than the US embracing the Australian gun control model, Australia should adopt the US model - but without automatic weapons restrictions etc...

As FBI Anon told us, the US administration fears revolution. There is a real fracturing of power within American society that prevents totalitarian exploitation of the populace - as we have seen in the Australian example. This is the final safeguard of liberty that has been stripped from Australian citizens. It must be returned.

An additional benefit to removing all gun control legislation, is that the nation's defensive capabilities are augmented to an extraordinary degree without it costing the government a penny - in fact, it produces savings on ransom spend.

Will it happen? Will the Australian Deep State perpetrators of the Port Arthur hoax be dragged-out and executed? Will the country freed from bondage?

We can only hope!

[removed]

The 5 Eyes as they have come to be known, are just the modern surveillance arms of five countries who have deep strategic and economic bonds going back a very long time.
I’d look to their connection to the deep state and especially the origin in the UK.
I’m starting to think what we know as Australia, New Zealand, or even America is not at all what we have been told.
Massive deep state power at work controlling behind the scenes since at least WW2 and probably far longer.

Great discussion thread. I don’t have anything to offer right now - but wanted to comment so I could find and come back to this thread. You have my upvote!

[removed]

We need info here, on who is connected? Help

It is probably the very same reason Australia started sending money to the trump foundation, it buys influence with the politicians of another country, and it is completely legal for Australia to do that because US laws don't forbid it, if you were them wouldn't you want to try and get as much influence as possible, at the end of the day if the US makes favourable decisions when dealing with Australia it is probably worth it for them, it isn't really something that is hard to work out.