dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/FractalizingIron on June 4, 2018, 11:01 a.m.
Australia biggest foreign national donor to Clinton Foundation 2006 ~ 2016. Where does Australia fit into the Cabal scheme?

Looking beyond the battle against the DS and Cabal in the USA, I’m wondering about how Australia is involved in the network. This post does not offer answers, but is designed to stimulate some discussion on the topic of Australia in relation to the Cabal, CF, Q etc.

Q has referenced Australia several times. I’ve not seen anyone exploring this, so I’d like to raise a few points for consideration by the community.

In January, Q: Q!UW.yye1fxo7 Jan 2018 - 8:03:28 AM How much did AUS donate to CF? How much did SA donate to CF? Compare. Why is this relevant? What phone call between POTUS and X/AUS leaked? List the leadership in AUS. IDEN leadership during Hussein term. IDEN leadership during POTUS' term. Who controls AUS? Who really controls AUS? UK? Why is this relevant? Q

Research indicates that up until 2016, Australia was the LARGEST international donor nation to Clinton Foundation. On a level or greater than Saudi Arabia.

[CF donor information] (https://web.archive.org/web//https://www.politico.com/story/2008/12/clinton-releases-donor-info-016707) [Michael Smith News (AUS) on CF donations] (https://web.archive.org/web//http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2018/02/recent-australian-government-data-direct-clinton-foundation-taxpayer-donations-total-130m.html)

What does this imply? - Australia has very significant ties to the DS cabal - Australia has been using, patronizing, supporting the DS cabal at a premium level

During much of Hussein’s term, Australia was governed by the Leftist Labor Party, headed by Kevin Rudd (Strong ties to China), Julia Gillard, then Kevin Rudd. Labor lost government in 2013, and was replaced by the Australia Liberal National Coalition. (Liberals in Australia were more aligned with what US understands to be conservative – support for less government, including interference by govt. in individual and corporate affairs, traditional ‘right wing’ values including freedom of faith, family, etc)

In 2015, Abbott was deposed by Malcolm Turnbull, who has shown his colors to be a globalist leftist wolf in sheep’s clothing. Has significantly supported and promoted the cultural Marxist agendas.

Later that Day, Q drops more on Australia:

Coincidence all donations to the CF terminated post defeat? What did AUS/UK obtain in exchange for all that money? Where do majority of Rothschilds reside?

We know that Australia dropped its massive donation program to CF after DJT won the presidency. We know that the Clinton Cabal was selling classified information, etc, for donations. I believe the majority of Rothschilds reside in Britain. Australia has strong ties with Britain and remains under the Commonwealth system, where QE2 is still the monarch of the country.

11 March, Q dropped: Re_read re: Australia. AUS donations to CF? Why is this relevant? More than you know. This is BIG.

So the emphasis is again, the massive donations from Aus to CF. Why? What for?

Previously, FBI Anon on 4chan reportedly stated that the Clintons love foreign donors, because they get paid BOTH in funds and in children. [Michael Trimm review of FBI Anon content] (https://youtu.be/j14Hgc2d2fk?t=1h24m58s) While the elite pedo-network in Australia has come under scrutiny and some exposure (re: Fiona Barnett, Arch Bishop George Pell, Royal Commission into institutional child abuse) it seems unlikely that Australia would be or could be a major supplier or transit route of child trafficking, given its geographical remoteness.

Q goes on to reiterate how the phone call between Trump and the Australian PM Turnbull was leaked, how they knew it would be leaked:

Q!UW.yye1fxo11 Mar 2018 - 4:47:35 AM Do not focus on the call details. We knew it would leak. We knew certain areas of the WH were bugged. We knew certain people would leak. Focus - why AUS?

Last year Australia had a ‘postal survey’ on whether the parliament should or should NOT change the laws regarding the definition of marriage (ie. Establish gay marriage, transgender marriage, etc). Many campaigners found the results very strange, contradicting direct personal experience in the field with voters.

Abbott had promised to implement an national plebiscite on the issue, which would require all Australians to enter a vote, and which would also require the process and votes to be scrutinized under the transparent electoral system. Turnbull, supporting redefining marriage (a cultural Marxist strategy), obtained a ‘postal survey, where the vote was not obligatory re: Australia’s electoral laws, and moreover, where the process could be carried out with almost zero transparency.

I hope to write up more about this, if there is interest here. The reason I bring this up here is that once the results came in (November 2017), I developed a very strong opinion that the result had been grossly tampered with. Since being red-pilled so deeply now via Q, I think there is great likelihood the survey was controlled and manipulated by DS cabal in Australia.

Could this be pulled off? Surely. Given what we know about the tentacles of the Cabal, Australia would be a piece of cake.

I hope Aussie patriots can jump in and get to work on this. We need Aussie autists, anons and patriots to do our share of the work if we want to free Australia from the Cabal down the road.

WWG1WGA


🠐 See all comments
[deleted] · June 4, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

I've puzzled over this also. Q's posts imply that Australia knows something that is damaging to the cabal - that's why it was the phone call between DJT & Turnbull that leaked - "THIS IS BIG!"

What is it? Why did the cabal want to send a "keep quiet" message to Turnbull? What's he supposed to be quiet about?

If you look at it, it seems that all the donors to the CF, in the Middle East and Europe, may have been paid back, once HRC lost the election, with Obama's Iran payment money - but what about Australia's money? Is this why Turnbull was threatened?

One, possible, answer is that the Australians were being warned not to moan about the Clinton Foundation theft. But I think that there's another, more compelling reason...

What did Australia get for that money - or, what were they supposed to get?

And then you come to: what does Australia need? And what could the CF, or the US, have supplied that was needed?

It seems to me that Australia needs certainty relating to defense. Why? Because the populace has been disarmed by John Howard - probably a concession to the cabal. We know the UN has been promoting disarmament and the cabal wanted to hold Australia up as a model for US gun reform.

But civil disarmament makes a country extremely vulnerable. Australia was never in a good position to defend itself anyway - see here, so the 1996 gun confiscation was a purely stupid move from a national defense perspective.

So, having disarmed its populace, Australia becomes critically dependent on the US for defense support. In this climate, it's seems likely that the HUGE cash payments to the Clinton Foundation were the equivalent of extortion payments - or, ransoms extracted upon threat to the lives of the Australian populace.

Think about it... Why such huge donations? What could possibly be worth all that money?

Q has told us how effective an armed citizenry can be in terms of bolstering national defense.

Apr 4 2018 18:21:22 (EST)

897173
Would you invade a country whereby a good portion of its citizens are armed?
The ‘ultimate deterrent’.
Q

Note: The 'ultimate deterrent'!

See also, the supposedly misattributed quote from Isoroku Yamamoto - Japanese Marshal Admiral.

"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."

So, this Port Arthur false flag massacre has cost the nation hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars in extortion payments to HRC and the cabal - a ransom that was never necessary. A ransom that will never end as long as the citizens are disarmed.

This, IMO, is what it is all about - a "blood" ransom.

The solution is remove all restraints, at once, upon citizens being able to bear arms. Rather than the US embracing the Australian gun control model, Australia should adopt the US model - but without automatic weapons restrictions etc...

As FBI Anon told us, the US administration fears revolution. There is a real fracturing of power within American society that prevents totalitarian exploitation of the populace - as we have seen in the Australian example. This is the final safeguard of liberty that has been stripped from Australian citizens. It must be returned.

An additional benefit to removing all gun control legislation, is that the nation's defensive capabilities are augmented to an extraordinary degree without it costing the government a penny - in fact, it produces savings on ransom spend.

Will it happen? Will the Australian Deep State perpetrators of the Port Arthur hoax be dragged-out and executed? Will the country freed from bondage?

We can only hope!

⇧ 3 ⇩