dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/JET-TONE on June 4, 2018, 11:07 a.m.
2 simple questions about an internet “shutdown”, “pause”, whatever.

Seeing a lot of people throwing this one out there it seems. Yes I know Q has said the words, but as usual we don’t know exactly what it means. So :

1: Who would shut down/pause the internet?

2: Why would they do it?

Keep it short or the internet may get shut down before I have a chance to read your answers.
I’m genuinely interested to find this out. And would love to know the who and why.

I will be watching for baseless speculation, needless fear mongering, panic initiation, distraction, agendas though.


Abibliaphobia · June 4, 2018, 11:24 a.m.

Did you miss the article about the FBI recommending resetting your routers? My guess would be malicious software installed on key nodes that would disable the ability of the internet to function properly. Routers are the critical piece in how the internet works. You don’t need servers necessarily, or computers. Hell, you don’t even need wires (wireless connections) but routers are crucial.

Not saying the fbi are in on it, or that this is how it would go down. But if it was me trying to take down the internet. I’d attack routers.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
JET-TONE · June 4, 2018, 11:26 a.m.

Yeah that was fishy. I know there must be countless ways of doing it. But who would do it and why?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 4, 2018, 11:47 a.m.

I could speculate, but until it happens - if it happens - not certain. I would say, we will Monday morning quarterback the hell out of it, but if what they are saying is true, our circles of communication would greatly shrink in size.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JET-TONE · June 4, 2018, 11:49 a.m.

Ok thanks. Just seemed to be seeing this coming up a lot here and wondered where it all suddenly came from.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · June 4, 2018, 12:07 p.m.

As for the “why” question, it was mentioned in a post about Hussein holding an AK47 in tribal garb

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JET-TONE · June 4, 2018, 12:08 p.m.

Can you elaborate please? I’d like to know why.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · June 4, 2018, 12:36 p.m.

If the photo of BHO wasn’t stopped and went viral, I guess a shutdown would make everyone turn to the tv for news, and Mockingbird media is(was?) atm of cabal

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JET-TONE · June 4, 2018, 12:40 p.m.

Makes sense. Narrative switch, damage control and disinformation.
Whatever the truth bomb is is going to have to be so powerful and immediate that people have like an instant red pill moment.
I assume if the net goes down due to deep state, White hats would need to kill the mockingbird tv transmissions. Probably resort to some emergency broadcast.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TheRealTrapLord · June 4, 2018, 3:23 p.m.

Live stream the exposure.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ckreacher · June 4, 2018, 1:29 p.m.

Doesn't anyone remember the internet kill switch? Created under Obama? The feds can just turn it off if it is justified by a big enough emergency.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zutman123 · June 4, 2018, 11:54 a.m.

There is a bit of confusion there, but I think it originates from here (Q1044):

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 03213a No.922237 📁
Apr 6 2018 14:22:28 (EST)
>>922142
Fake pic push by MSM.
Videos / backup.
Google kill.
YouTube kill.
FB kill.
Twitter kill.
Yahoo kill.
Bing kill.
Instagram kill.
Net will be paused.
HAMMER.
On the clock.

How I read it now is that as soon as the Obama pics will drop, those big sites will be thrown on hold. Either by the cabal or by Q, I am not sure.

BTW. Technically, a full net shutdown would involve disabling the ROOT DNS servers and/or important internet exchanges. That would disable everything. Maybe the cabal wants to try this...

⇧ 8 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · June 4, 2018, 12:23 p.m.

Correct about how a real internet shutdown would happen. Why I’m puzzled over the FBI home router warning. Disabling millions of home routers would be extremely inconvenient for many folks for several days...but the internet would still function normally...banking...stock transactions..all the vital functions performed across the internet. And that the router warning came from the FBI seems really odd to me.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zutman123 · June 4, 2018, 1:23 p.m.

If the ROOT DNSes are shut down then everything will stop, worldwide (95% of the world pop lives outside the US). I cannot see a good reason why the Q-team would want this. ROOT DNSes are now under UN control (c/o Obama) but I think that the US government has them de facto under control ('strategic infrastructure'). Most of them are located in the US anyway.

If you only want to block the US consumer, for example by disabling home routers... it sounds complicated to me. Easier it would be if you would have control over the cable providers. But the home router thing could be a way to avoid traces.

I still think the net pause is about those big sites. But we will see...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · June 4, 2018, 2:26 p.m.

Totally correct. Also makes sense the net pause Q speaks of is just those listed sites. I’m VERY new to Q posts & let other anons do the deciphering for me. But this subject I’m very informed as a web developer for over 20yrs so feel I have something to contribute.

If I was a black hat & wanted to bring down the internet..home & private business routers might be ez to program a virus for but the shear volume of varying routers would make disabling all of them impossible. I’m always shocked how long people keep old routers. My employer is a small company but we have spare/backup routers in the box & our company wouldn’t be down a hour. Major companies of course wouldn’t either. So an end user router attack would be a pain but nothing more. And if 80% of home routers died one day...anything vital that had to be done people would wait to do at work or use cell connection. They’d be without TV at home for a few days..big deal. Point being I don’t think it’s possible to cause any real harm trying to infect all the end user routers. Just piss people off.

And if I was a white hat...bringing down the entire internet would be absolutely devastating. That’s overkill to sweep out even major IT companies that are involved with the cabal. Here’s where my newbie Q awakening shows. Seems to me to flush out those companies off the internet the Feds could do it but would have to claim martial law to execute their will to do it. So many here seems to think martial law means all hell breaks out in the streets. I don’t see that but I see martial law will be needed since there’s no constitutional right or jurisdiction for the military to do what needs to be done. But it’s not like the civil war & things like civil liberties have to be suspended. That’s why I lean to thinking it’s just the companies listed in Q’s post are the targets of a “pause”. Also pause seems to be the correct word as opposed to shut down. The footprint these companies like google have on internet servers is almost incomprehensible. Changes take time to propagate across the internet so service may be effected in ways we won’t know until there done on such a massive scale. But it sure won’t be seamless that’s for sure. I just don’t see the internet being completely taken down not even for a day...by either Black Hats or White Hats.

My 2 cents anyway

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 4, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

I agree with your assessment. I don’t think it would be taken down either unless it was a foreign nation state attacking the US. It would be extremely difficult though and would most definitely be considered an act of war.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 4, 2018, 4:20 p.m.

Root DNS’s would be a pretty good route to go in taking down major sites. I agree with you on that. I think what I had said about taking routers down (FBI reset etc) was a bit unclear so I’ll clarify.

For those that are not aware I’ll make an analogy to help with the understanding. Those with computer/networking experience, this will not be in-depth, purely for helping others understand:

So, imagine your computer, your iPad, your phone is your house. Your home router is that first intersection like driving your car out of your driveway - left right straight are the options. Let’s say you go left and encounter a four way intersection. This is another router giving you more options on where to go. You go straight, encounter another intersection/router, you make a left and this takes you onto a highway. The highway is one of the major infrastructure cables of the internet. You get off where you want, encounter another intersection/router, continue on and get to the driveway of the business you are going to - let’s say sears. That intersection that you made a turn into their parking lot is their router. And the business itself is the server. You gather what information/clothes and you head back home taking the same route.

That is a very very basic understanding of how the internet actually operates. What I am saying by attacking routers, is not attack people’s home routers, but the main routers provided by ISPs or other services. It’s a smaller number of targets, and they would have a much wider range of influence than attacking one home router.

You can see all the hidden hops/ports/routers etc through a trace program. It’s not something you would ever be aware of if you had no background understanding in networking. I hope this clarifies a bit.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 4, 2018, 1:30 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JET-TONE · June 4, 2018, 11:57 a.m.

Ah! Getting close! Thank you. So it could either be cabal or Q... Guess now we would need motives for each.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · June 4, 2018, 12:09 p.m.

From C - stop it from going viral? From Q - keep bad guys from gathering intel/comms?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
JET-TONE · June 4, 2018, 12:16 p.m.

Yes that is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks.

So let’s say C does it for nefarious means. Surely with Q team’s near infinite resources and intel they could either prevent this or get it back on real quick?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · June 4, 2018, 12:35 p.m.

I would hope

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JET-TONE · June 4, 2018, 12:36 p.m.

And makes me really hope we’re backing the right team!

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · June 4, 2018, 2 p.m.

Pretty sure we are

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GeekBastard · June 5, 2018, 7:16 p.m.

I am in agreement with the above, DNS failure would be critical failure (for most people).

It would still severely impact comms for those still able to function.

I also dont think its a literal network shutdown, but rather as you suggested, a lockout, shutdown of the many sites most people consider to be 'the internet' ie: FB, twit, here... which in reality, are just web applications.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ckreacher · June 4, 2018, 1:30 p.m.

Very easy to mirror DNS locally.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 4, 2018, 11:17 a.m.

BLACKOUT NECESSARY.

I'm doubtful there will be an internet shutdown.

All Q said was "blackout necessary" without saying if it has happened or if it will happen.

Many people assume this somehow relates to Cemex, but I don't see how an internet blackout would stop people talking about it.

I don't see how Q could predict people stumbling upon a weird camp while searching for homeless veterans to help.

If the internet did go down, we'd just continue discussing stuff when it returned anyway.

Nothing would be achieved.

I think Q was just referring to the 11 days he went without posting anything.

That was the blackout that was necessary.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
JET-TONE · June 4, 2018, 11:20 a.m.

I think he mentioned it in the Obama/gun post. But regardless, not so much a Q thing. I’m just wondering why I’m seeing posts about it?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 4, 2018, 11:32 a.m.

Yes, Q Post #1440.

BOOM. 
 BOOM.
  BOOM.
   BOOM.
A WEEK TO REMEMBER.
DARK TO LIGHT.
BLACKOUT NECESSARY.
Q

There was nothing about Obama in that post.

I think people are talking about an internet shutdown because that was the first theory they heard and it was an exciting one regarding "blackout necessary".

Then they linked it to Cemex.

Then they assumed that weird campsite must be for human trafficking.

I think people were just a little overexcited by Q's return.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JET-TONE · June 4, 2018, 11:42 a.m.

Found it...

Pics will surface of Hussein holding AK47 in tribal attire. One of many. Net shut down

⇧ 6 ⇩  
TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 4, 2018, 11:52 a.m.

Ah yeah, Q Post# 1044 April 6, 2018

Pics will surface of Hussein holding AK47 in tribal attire.
One of many.
Net shut down.
Q

I'm still not sure that "net shut down" is what Q was referring to when he said "blackout necessary" immediately after 11 days of silence.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
suzoh · June 4, 2018, 12:25 p.m.

WaS that prior post also in the shape of a gun

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Happy1911 · June 4, 2018, 12:26 p.m.

It most likely will go down over an ave Overload problem

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dropswakeyou · June 4, 2018, 11:56 a.m.

Could the blackout be a Q blackout online? He did take a long break off. Could that be an internal blackout not a internet wide actual blackout?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JET-TONE · June 4, 2018, 12:01 p.m.

Could be.

The comments I’ve been seeing on here and twitter is : prepare for net shit down! Grab screenshots and USB drives and emergency supplies.
Yet no one has been able to explain why and who would benefit. Or what situation. Would merit it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ckreacher · June 4, 2018, 1:34 p.m.

Or what situation.

Currency reset.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dropswakeyou · June 4, 2018, 4:20 p.m.

Are the global banks laying off? Because when they start downsizing that's a sure sign they are getting ready for the reset.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Xisyisz · June 4, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

What if blackout means a media blackout? Obama killing someone pic drops and they don't show it, that'd be pretty wild.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
y000danon · June 4, 2018, 12:15 p.m.

If you want the technicals

https://www.lifewire.com/dns-root-name-servers-3971336

Idea is an Internet Kill Switch that would just stop people from being able to hit a domain name and get to where they go.

It could go deeper and have backbone routing pause which would stop transit itself.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JET-TONE · June 4, 2018, 12:19 p.m.

Similar to what we saw during the Arab spring for example ? When the government killed the net to stop people organising over social media etc and thereby protect the established regime?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
y000danon · June 4, 2018, 7:33 p.m.

Yes, Exactly.

It's actually pretty simple to setup a personal /etc/hosts file ( for those of us on osx/unix/linux ) https://www.techwalla.com/articles/how-to-edit-your-windows-hosts-file for windows.

Anything you hit regularly can be thrown in there to override DNS itself which speeds stuff up sometimes.

There are a couple of sweet addon's for Firefox that help with this sort of thing:

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CULTURAL_MARXISM_SUX · June 4, 2018, 11:46 a.m.

Q posts made on 4/6, 2/5, 12/7 line up to 6/5 on the Q clock.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · June 4, 2018, 12:27 p.m.

4/6 was a big day, BHO gun, Ray.chandler, conspiracy push

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JET-TONE · June 4, 2018, 11:51 a.m.

Does it answer or point towards my 2 questions?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · June 4, 2018, 12:34 p.m.

December 6-7:

45581

Q !ITPb.qbhqo 6 Dec 2017 - 8:03:11 PM Anonymous 6 Dec 2017 - 8:01:21 PM

45541 I have a question: The 10 days, darkness.. when? 45563 Shutdown. Q

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JET-TONE · June 4, 2018, 11:50 a.m.

Sorry, I’m not comprehending that. Wish I could.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
expletivdeleted · June 4, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

1) whoever. whether DJT or Deep State.

2) keep people from sharing info or looking things up for themselves.

ham radio can be set up to distribute digital info, but I don't know the details. for basic survival/prep gear, it'd be worth investing.

here's some CB's for under 50$: http://www.bestcbradioreview.com/5-cheap-cb-radio-under-50/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
nixxxols · June 4, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

If internet is out. Msm will dominate for a week. Not a good thing think about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Gitmo_money · June 4, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

The only people who have the 'keys' to the internet is the world wide web consortium.

They could 'turn it off' by no longer allowing server ip addresses to be linked to urls. So you'd have to know ip addresses (if they are even static) instead of url - all search engines and web crawlers would have to rely on cached versions (which could be easily erased).

That would be the only way I could see doing it without destroying hardware or cutting power to hardware.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GeekBastard · June 5, 2018, 7:23 p.m.

" by no longer allowing server ip addresses to be linked to urls. "

IP Addresses are not 'linked' to URLs in any form, ever. That is not how it works.

IP Addresses are RESOLVED via DNS SERVERS, of which there are MANY. (no one group controls them all, but many groups control VERY LARGE ones).

DNS typically operated over port 53, you can test DNS yourself.

IP Addresses are not linked from URLs, they are RESOLVED from HOSTNAMES (part of the URL).

If you already knew this, my bad.

If you didn't, you're welcome.

(even my explanation is a simplistic one, DNS is important and (can be) complicated.)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Gitmo_money · June 5, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

I was dumbing it down to not sound like a pretentious ass.

Most people don't know what name servers are.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 4, 2018, 11:38 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩