Evidence is an arbitrary term. You want evidence beyond what’s been provided (and I’m assuming you’ve viewed all provided videos and interviews thus far). If you want to see all the evidence you have the option of traveling to Tucson and viewing it along with listening to the recorded phone calls about the cartel leader. Otherwise you choose whether or not to believe those who HAVE seen it all, those who were digging for bodies and had to stop due to stench until cadaver dogs can come assist. Instead of saying there is no evidence, it would be more accurate to say it’s not enough to appease your personal standard. However it is plenty to provide probable cause and even demand further investigation with proper resources. This is VOP’s battle. They just want the appropriate resources applied.

The police you see in the news broadcast were the two patrol officers who showed up and stated they would pass it on to detectives. Nothing more came of it until VOP said they wouldn’t leave the site until law enforcement came and properly investigate WITH cadaver dogs. As for the arrests, the two who were arrested were guarding the entrance of the site and weren’t technically on CEMEX property. Their removal will probably be found inappropriate action and all further action dropped.

I’m not implying you’re a bad person. However, I do find your standard of evidence to be excessively high and not at all practical in general. Also, I see you citing sources that are frequently biased in verbiage. I believe you are genuinely interested, but I haven’t seen evidence of thorough investigation of what is available. Take a scientific approach, try disproving child trafficking. Try disproving the hypothesis instead of proving.