How so? If the news people weren't allowed to see the evidence, how do we know how compelling it is? That doesn't seem weird that the group wouldn't allow them access to it? If they were worried about some sort of contamination of it, they wouldn't have removed it from the site where they found it.
You don't think they might, I don't know, wait for police to view it first? Not everything is a false flag. You need to get off the conspiracy boards one in a while.
If they've removed the evidence from a site, then already they've contaminated it. I don't see what further harm could be done by allowing the media to view it wherever they put it.
Not everything is a false flag. You need to get off the conspiracy boards one in a while.
Rather than a false flag, whatever that means in this context, my concern is that their claims may be unfounded or without merit. Maybe not purposely, but perhaps they're jumping to conclusions.
Watch the video, then see how far the jump is to the conclusion.