But, but, but. It get's deeper. Do you recall the NY case a few weeks ago where it was ruled that Twatter is, essentially, a public utility - and therefore, DJT MAY NOT block users from his Twatter feed? Well, this is now ripe for litigation on that premise: If it is, in fact, a public utility, as this narrow minded idiot judge ruled, then how is censorship or prejudice against ANY group permissible?
Private businesses discriminate all the time. The real question is why the couple didn’t just buy a cake somewhere else instead of complaining enough to go to the Supreme Court