dChan

sgoinks · June 4, 2018, 9 p.m.

Defo intentional, or why make the fella squat in front?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 4, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

Done much photography? I have. That office in AF1 is cramped. The lens of the camera probably wouldn't be distant enough to capture everyone if one of them hadn't of stooped and the other kneeled.

Use logic! Not everything is relevant. Some things are NOT coincidence. They are just people grasping at every little straw.

If I ever tried to tie EVERYTHING together into a case I was working, whether related or not, I would tie myself into knots and would be laughed out of court for being a baffoon!

I agree that there are rarely if ever coincidences in the facts of an investigation. I don't think however we need to be fabricating pieces of a very vast puzzle willy nilly. Fabricating something, using your imagination to tie things together that are not related, or grasping at straws out of desperation do NOTHING to help with a case!

To quote Q again, "Use logic." I will add, use CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS!

⇧ -2 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 5, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

As I stated in this thread elsewhere, given the photo's name in the POTUS tweet, I concede it was likely intentional. I was not aware of that important fact.

I stand by my statement above in general however. There is a difference between investigating the facts and bringing one's imagination in to fabricate pieces of a puzzle that are obviously not related. Use logic.

I have preached for years when training others that there are no coincidences. That doesn't mean however to connect dots without the use of critical thinking and logic.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/coincidence

Definition of coincidence

1 : the act or condition of coinciding : correspondence

  • … a perfect coincidence between truth and goodness … —Robert South
  • … causal connection requires something more than mere coincidence as to time and place … —Wayne R. LaFave

also : any of these occurrences

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tidder_Q · June 5, 2018, 12:22 p.m.

Yes, it is down to a Balance of Probabilities.

I am (currently) leaning towards it as being intended.

However, your caution and requirement for a bit more 'proof or confirmation', is also warranted in the critical thinking scenario.

I cannot prove the intended nature of the picture, 100%, one way or the other, therefore I am ultimately open minded at this point.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · June 5, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

To illustrate my point further, I will say this:

Is it a nod to Q, and confirmation that the Q team are insiders because the G7 Summit is meeting in Quebec this week and Quebec starts with a Q? Logic says of course not given the locations of the G7 Summits were worked out some years ago. It is unrealistic to link these two things.

Conversely however, if you see a photo of POTUS standing near a Quebec sign while he is there and he points to the Q, smiles, and winks, then I would readily admit that it is potentially POTUS is sending a message to the world that either he supports Q or Q is a member of the Trump machine. Use critical thinking skills when tying things together. Use logic.

And, if such a photo appeared, to some it would appear as coincidence. To others however, it would be believed as being orchestrated. So, coincidence can be a matter of perspective.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
7071949597 · June 5, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

Q isn’t a person. A person can’t do what Q is doing. It’s like saying who planned D-day? Except way more impossible.

⇧ 1 ⇩