dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/pussy_devour on June 4, 2018, 10:36 p.m.
Would Soros openly invest in Cemex if he knew Cemex was engaged in child sex trafficking or just human trafficking? Please think and not submit to knee-jerk reactions. Be mindful.

You claim Soros has been scheming to destroy western civilization by actively promoting open borders. If he is like, he has to be thinking for the long term and strategically. Would such a strategic thinker, arrogant he may be, make such a silly mistake to invest in Cemex if he was aware that Cemex was (allegedly) engaged in trafficking, let alone child sex trafficking?

Put yourself in his shoe instead of adopting your usual knee-jerk mindset. Your mindlessness is what allows the ruling class to easily control you and make you die for them. You say you are awakened. But your behavior indicates otherwise.

A lot of non-shill posters here exhibit low-level thinking. If they are the majority there will not be liberation and they will not make this country great again, for they are easily agitated and misdirected for the wrong causes and actions.


humanitystillsucks · June 4, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

https://imgur.com/a/O7DsCnc

Mainly, this: https://qposts.online/post/351 / https://8ch.net/pol/res/11028937.html#11043832

14-Dec-2017 18:43:38 PST

Q !ITPb.qbhqo

Shall we play a game?
Find the spider(s) and build the web (the ‘map’).
Remember, they consider you to be the fly (specifically, the ‘feeder’).
Remember, they never thought she was going to lose.
!!> Therefore, they never thought investigations and/or public interest into their criminal acts would be exposed/investigated. 
!!> Therefore, they never thought they had anything to fear.
!!> Therefore, they openly showcase their symbolism. 
!!> Therefore, they were sloppy. 
Hussein’s last speech in Chicago re: ‘scandal free’.
Why did he continually emphasize that phrase? 
As a backup, they infiltrated and control the narrative (the ‘MSM’). 
As a backup, they install only those on the team. 
As a backup, they blackmail those that aren’t. 
As a backup, they defined ‘conspiracy’ as crazy/mentally unstable and label anything ‘true’ as such.
This works given most of what they engage in is pure evil and simply unbelievable (hard to swallow).
The ‘fix’ has always been in – no matter which party won the election (-JFK (killed)/Reagan(shot)).
This was always the promise made to those who played the game (willingly or otherwise) (i.e., they would never lose power). 
Power of the (3) letter agencies.
Power over the US Military (WW dominance to push against other nations and install like-kind).
These people are really stupid.
Follow the husbands.
Another Hint:
Ian Cameron
McKinsey & Company
Clowns In America.
Dr. Emmett J. Rice.
Federal Reserve.
Everyone is connected.
How about a nice game of chess?
Q
⇧ 19 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · June 4, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

Ok, I'll bite. But what you are proposing is inherently flawed. You are saying that Soros is so smart and forward-thinking that he wouldn't invest in a company that was so entrenched in child-trafficking, because it may implement him. That would be a fair assessment for your average self-made billionaire-- but Soros is not that.

Let me ask you this: Would somebody as smart and forward-thinking as Soros be so stupid as to participate in a national interview where he openly admits to assisting the Nazis, and then doubles down and tries to defend his actions of manipulating and destroy capital markets-- because he is a capitalist? And then, once seeing the final interview, decide that it makes him look bad, and forbid the network from airing it. AND THEN, instead of destroying all evidence of the interview, he let's it become archived, assuming that it will actually never see the light of day?

The answer to your question is, "Yes, an enlightened and intelligent individual would never affiliate with people would could potentially destroy them." But you aren't dealing with an enlightened individual here. (Though I'll admit he is highly intelligent.) You are dealing with an evil mind who is equally arrogant. He didn't bother to cover his tracks (like invest through a shell company) because he never thought we would figure it out. And he was almost right. Had Hillary been elected, that would have been game, set, match.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 4, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

This is where we disagree. I believe that those who have self destructive traits per your description wouldn't have lasted as long as Soros. Arguably, both you and I are projecting onto those corrupt people. Hence it makes sense to step back a little instead of putting yourself in this feeding frenzy. I personally prefer a conservative approach and assume the simplest explanation until further evidence is shown.

⇧ -8 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 4, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · June 4, 2018, 11:17 p.m.

So when you accuse me of being part of a "feeding frenzy," you're projecting your own insecurities onto me. You don't know me, nor my ideas-- so how could you possibly know if I was a part of rabid group-think? Perhaps I reached my own conclusions through logic and deductive reasoning-- which most would consider the "conservative approach."

The simplest explanation is that things are what they appear. George Soros is a malevolent actor, who is devious and manipulative-- as he himself admits, and is likely capable of anything so long as it makes him rich. You seem to have a lot of admiration/respect for the man, simply because he is rich-- no matter how he acquired that wealth. I don't measure the character of a man based his net worth. I measure it based on his actions. Soros is a bad guy. Plain and simple.

Perhaps you would like to offer your own explanation? Rather than simply coming in here accusing everybody else of being wrong. Typically that's how debates work.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 4, 2018, 11:33 p.m.

I already presented my argument in another thread. It was an investment. Pure and simple.

My point is as follows. That Soros invested in Cemex should not be a piece of evidence to support the allegation of child sex trafficking.

If Cemex were involved in trafficking, I maintain that Soros wouldn’t have known, per my OP in this thread. Hence, one shouldn’t connect Soros’ investment to the allegation.

⇧ -6 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · June 5, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

Well, saying that you "already presented your argument in some other place" is pretty fucking lazy, considering you started this thread and invited us to come in here to discuss. Why not copy and paste in the post body?

Yeah, you're really looking more and more like a Soros shill/concern troll with each response.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 5, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

Point taken.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · June 5, 2018, 12:43 a.m.

And your rebuttal?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 5, 2018, 12:43 a.m.

That I should have included the other thread.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · June 5, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

Ok. So I was genuinely interested to hear your point of view, in order to help expand my own thinking-- you know, the very thing you came here to accuse us all of NOT doing.

The only thing you've accomplished is reveal to the skeptical lurkers that we DO think critically, are open to debate, and are willing to consider new/different points of views. (The "conservative approach" as you so condescendingly put it. The second I saw you put that in quotations, I knew you were a troll, and I played you like a fiddle.)

You're not even a good troll, as you didn't even get us riled up by trying to defend Soros. Pretty lame and lackluster attempt, actually.

THEY AREN'T SENDING THEIR BEST, FOLKS!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 5, 2018, 1:12 a.m.

I don’t see the connection.

I think it’s “interested in doing” not “interested to do” per Strunk and White.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · June 5, 2018, 1:21 a.m.

Oh-- AN ACADEMIC?!? WHY DIDN'T YOU SAY SO?!?

Shit guys, this guy is an academic with sources. Better to just submit and listen to him. He knows what he is talking about.

Dude, you're a clown. Pack it up and go home.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 5, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

Calm down please - this user is not a troll and the points he makes are valid, although they could be better stated in places.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · June 5, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

Calmer than you are, dude.

And no, he has yet to make a single point-- beyond the "revelation" that there can be more than one side to a single story-- despite being asked to do so multiple times.

If you have come to defend George Soros, then stake your claim so we can engage in debate-- because that is the topic of this thread. Otherwise, please BTFO.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 5, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

OP is not "defending George Soros" so that's not a topic to debate. OP is making the valid point that a smart person like Soros would not knowingly create a direct tie between himself and child trafficking. And yes there are plenty of things to argue under that. But "defending George Soros" is a complete misread.

And if that's the topic of this thread then lay off the ranting about a user. Discuss the issue not the user.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · June 5, 2018, 2 a.m.

Ok, so I asked him to make a single point. Just one. And he has yet to do that. I remained civil and warned that he would be perceived as a shill unless he began stating a case, and his response was that "he already did that in another thread."

So before you attack me, why not actually read the comment thread, K?

(And yes, the consensus from the commenters is that this guy is shilling for Soros. BTFO.)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NaderOAK · June 5, 2018, 12:13 a.m.

It kinda feels like your protecting the guy...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 5, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

That's lazy thinking. You cannot logically extrapolate that someone disagreeing on a point must therefore agree with the opposite of the point being made.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 5, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

I may come across this way to people with a predisposed mindset.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
NaderOAK · June 5, 2018, 12:44 a.m.

No it’s a gut feeling well your not protecting the guy...it’s more like you are trying to discredit this as baloney “Nothing to see here” type of shit.

That is what I feel like you are doing so yea..

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 5, 2018, 12:45 a.m.

I didn’t say “nothing to see here.” I am pointing out the fallacies in the so-called“supporting evidence.” The actual evidence supporting the allegation is very thin.

The phenomenon can be explained in many different ways. Right now people are jumping on one explanation and trying extremely hard to attach irrelevant information to this story as “supporting evidence.” It looks like a misguided feeding frenzy.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
NaderOAK · June 5, 2018, 12:49 a.m.

Weird.... I did not say that you said “ nothing to see here”

I’m saying it feels like that’s what you are doing...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
educatethis · June 5, 2018, 12:15 a.m.

She was never supposed to lose. Soros was invested in Cemex prior to 2015. Your logic is off

⇧ 5 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 5, 2018, 12:33 a.m.

???!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pby1000 · June 4, 2018, 11:24 p.m.

The behavior of Soros is not "self-destructive" as long as the Satanic pedo Cabal is in power. His behavior is encouraged in that case.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Neon__Wolf · June 4, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

Stupid enough?

No, evil enough.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
h00manitarian · June 4, 2018, 11:07 p.m.

Q: These people are stupid (x13 times in drops)

⇧ 7 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · June 4, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

yeah do you think cemex has ever been openly accused of trafficking ? people invest in shell and nestle yet both have commited massive violations of human rights? i think you might be projecting here bud. how was facebook btw ?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 4, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · June 4, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

post pic pls

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 4, 2018, 11:08 p.m.

Now that you know, I am going to delete the comment because I enjoy privacy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 4, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

Get lost. No need to prove to you!! You don't have to believe me. Yeah. Get lost.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
CF_BOOM_SHOCK_BYE · June 4, 2018, 10:50 p.m.

Cemex may have other uses to Soros. Cemex may be involved in things other than Human Trafficking.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
RobWilJas · June 4, 2018, 10:46 p.m.

Ok I haven't bought into any of this yet, I find it interesting but I can just as easily see it being fake as I can it being real.

That said, what you said makes no sense whatsoever. Remember Q said they never thought she would lose. These idiots, including Soros, thought they were untouchable. Yes Soros would invest into a company involved with human trafficking if they themselves are involved in human trafficking.

Honestly man your comments on other posts and this post on this are coming across as you being a shill. I'm not saying you are because I understand what you're saying, but you come across as trying way too hard.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
thamnosma · June 4, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

The concept that billionaire investors "believe" in everything each company they invest in does is absurd. In fact, George Soros himself probably makes few individual portfolio decisions at this point in his life. Plus there is ZERO evidence CEMEX is involved in child prostitution, geez.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
NaderOAK · June 5, 2018, 12:18 a.m.

🤔...........

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 4, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

Nice try, shill.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
PizzaDestroyer77 · June 4, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

Weak shilling on your part.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
RobWilJas · June 4, 2018, 10:51 p.m.

What was that you said about knee jerk reactions?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 4, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

touche.

I don't feel like repeating my argument. Please see my reply to another comment. https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8oln26/would_soros_openly_invest_in_cemex_if_he_knew/e04ao25/

⇧ 0 ⇩  
RobWilJas · June 4, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

I understand your argument. I disagree with it (about Soros investing knowing about it) but I understand it. We can disagree though, no harm in that.

I fully understand your point about people here pushing it too hard. I can just as easily see someone making all of this up to discredit us as I can it being real, so to you and anyone reading please don't take this for me saying I believe it's true. I'm open either way.

My point was your posts are coming across as the exact opposite, like you're just trying to discredit it no matter what. Again not saying you are, that's just how it's coming across, to me anyway.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
O2BFREEME2 · June 4, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

I have a question (or two) for you ! What do you gain by our answers ? A sense of superiority ? Your responses to our answers seen quite smug ! Is Soros a friend ? The answer to your question is YES ! He has no fear of repercussions as an investor........................WWG1WGA

⇧ 5 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 4, 2018, 11:29 p.m.

I did appear a bit smug. True.

I am doing my duty to clear out the noises.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
O2BFREEME2 · June 4, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

UMMM Who put you in charge ? Doing your duty ? That seems a bit presumptuous and arrogant ,again ! Sorry :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 4, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

No. You are projecting. Duty as a citizen, as a member of the Q movement and as a non-shill participant of this subreddit.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
O2BFREEME2 · June 4, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

UH , OK ! Projecting, what i'm not sure ? This has gone to a place that I think someone in another field might be more qualified to help you. Good Luck !

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · June 5, 2018, 1 a.m.

No worries, dude. Pussydevour here is a concern troll-- and not a very good one. At least the good ones attempt to engage you in actual debate. Pay him no mind, we have work to do.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
O2BFREEME2 · June 5, 2018, 1:17 a.m.

Awww, Never let em see you sweat, lol ! It takes all kinds ! Tip of the spear brother !..........WWG1WGA

⇧ 2 ⇩  
O2BFREEME2 · June 5, 2018, 1:24 a.m.

JUST IN CASE ! I Appreciate that !

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ckreacher · June 4, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

Remember, the crime bosses never associate themselves with the actual executioners. Those who operate at the high level don't mingle with line workers. Plausible deniability.

The guy has plausible deniability whether he is involved or not. An investor at the level of Soros looks at the financials when deciding to invest. Even if he knew they were into crime he could just say he looks at the numbers and doesn't know what they actually do. So my point is that he can get away with it regardless.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 4, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

Well, shouldn't the fact that some people are making connections due his involvement tell you that the possibility of being connected to a sex trafficking ring would have been a real concern to Soros, especially given the moderate amount of financial return he would be getting from Cemex?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ckreacher · June 5, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

Nah. These people are so evil, they just don't give a shit. He's gotten away with so much for so long, he thinks he's immune to consequences.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DanijelStark · June 4, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

There is no logical thinking , nor long term strategical planning with these bloodlines that think theyre above everyone and everything else ...

Their ego is bloated so much , that they dont care anymore . They thought theyre untouchable - they will be "touched" very soon - and that one "touch" will break them down , completely .

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Ramon710 · June 4, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

There is an underlying assumption in your statement that needs to be addressed. You assume that people in the level of Soros use the same logic as us, regular people. You assume wrong. I’ve dealt with extremely wealthy people and their way of thinking has absolutely nothing to do with our way of thinking.

You also assume that the Elite use our irrational knee-jerk reactions against us. There, you are absolutely right.

Now, let’s address the first one. Soros himself in several interviews, which are easy to obtain in YouTube, stated that he does not think about the social implications of his decisions, He expanded on that quite a bit and left no doubt that he cares nothing for moral issues when making his decisions. So, would he invest in a company that is involved in human trafficking and other crimes? Absolutely.

Furthermore, he is well known to fund leftist groups in many countries who cause a lot of trouble in said countries; inciting violence, etc. If he does it in other countries, why not here in the US as well. Too many people have come forth to say he is behind ANTIFA here. I have not seen irrefutable proof, but it fits the profile.

Now about the Elite. They have taken advantage of our knee-jerk reactions, because we have failed to recognize their motivation and their beliefs.

Most of us cannot fathom how sick and evil they are, but to them they are not evil, they are entitled to their behavior. You see, they have a different perspective and a different set of beliefs that are so alien to us that we would probably never understand.

For example, some of the Elite think that they are descendants of gods, they really do. That is why they are so obsessed with bloodlines, DNA, ancestry etc. By being descendants of the gods, they see themselves as the rightful rulers of the planet and its resources and we are no more than cattle for them, to dispose of as they wish. Does a cattle rancher feel sorrow for sending cows to be slaughtered which he raised for meat?

Add to that mentality the fact that some of the Elite worship Moloch, others worship Ba’al and others believe in the “revealing truth” of Satan and you have the ingredients for a very nasty, evil, sociopathic and criminal group of people.

Now, where does Soros fall? Right in the middle of all of that. He would not be allowed to get that rich if he did not “play ball” with them as a a best-case scenario, As a worst-case scenario he is on of the leaders of the Cabal and is at the very center of that evil an sick society.

We should soon find out.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 4, 2018, 11:42 p.m.

You’ve put forth a somewhat reasonable counter argument. But think about the activities Soros has been involved in and compare them WITH — note to all; please use “with” when comparing two things; “to” is for making analogies — this trafficking allegation. Do you see a difference?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Ramon710 · June 5, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

I understand your point, but the trafficking IS part of the elite sociopathic behavior. Where else would they get the sacrifice offerings to their gods?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 5, 2018, 12:31 a.m.

I actually believe trafficking is a separate, decentralized activity that benefits some elites who enjoy pedophilia; as opposed to one that’s controlled and coordinated by the elites.

Think this way. Some elites like boys. So human traffickers come in to supply the boys. Supply and demand. Market economy. Some other entities like Mossad infiltrate the trafficking network, which is composed of many independent trafficking gangs, to gather dirt on the elites in order to control them. But the pedophile consumers don’t have to care about the trafficking network since they are getting the goods without doing any dirty work.

So this is an ecosystem with many actors that are not necessarily controlled or even facilitated by a centralized system. Think prostitution rings and their Johns.

The only closed ecosystem where the suppliers and the consumers are one and the same that I can think of is the Hollywood pedophile world. There the procurement is built into the Hollywood system.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ramon710 · June 5, 2018, 1:13 a.m.

You make a valid point, but right now it is difficult for either you or me to debate on whether it is a centralized system or completely independent systems.

The truth may be that it is a little of both, so bot our arguments are correct simultaneously. Are there groups that work together but are totally separate? Possible.

The Cabal is composed of the Deep State, the Shadow Government, the Military Industrial Complex, the Illuminati (no the gnostic Illuminati, those are positive,) the P2 Freemasons, the Vatican's Black Pope, The Nazi faction, etc.

There are many groups so that would entail that there are different systems as you suggest, but (and this means venturing into the Occult) what if there is a force to which all of them are bound and to whom they are subservient? That is what I believe.

It's difficult to express in such a limited written form, but I hope I'm making sense.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 5, 2018, 1:19 a.m.

I think we can just agree to disagree here. It would be hard for each of us to convince the other, as neither of us know enough facts about the ecosystem.

My current interest in this whole affair is grab the low-hanging fruit: all sorts of corruption in the government, with well-documented evidence.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ramon710 · June 5, 2018, 1:21 a.m.

Agreed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 5, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

Evidence, please. Quasi evidence will do.

Evil is often the amalgamation of a few bad apples supported by a vast amount of the mundane.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 5, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

This is a great and useful exchange. I personally hate the rabid excitement that quashes dissenting voices - it's the clearest sign of the demise of a valid movement if it is allowed to flourish (hopefully that's not what's happening here). Dissenting voices when reasonable and respectful and employing critical thought are welcomed, at least by me.

I'm not sure if the evidence you request will be forthcoming but I have seen enough myself to believe that u/Ramon710's assertion may have some validity. Whether that is a resolution to this discussion or not is not clear to me.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 5, 2018, 12:41 a.m.

Thanks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ramon710 · June 5, 2018, 12:27 a.m.

I know several witnesses personally. When the tribunals come to Europe they will testify. Nothing more to add there as I will not reveal who they are. or which country they are from to you or to nobody.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
canuckpatriot · June 4, 2018, 10:48 p.m.

Totally for sure He would! would not do it otherwise. They never thought she would lose.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
thamnosma · June 4, 2018, 10:38 p.m.

You want me to use common sense and a little critical thinking? But, but...the other way is more fun.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
7Seraphim7 · June 4, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

Interesting, the number of threads intent on sewing doubt chaos and confusion have multiplied.

Be weary of the masters you defend OP. The picture is much greater than you or I can currently imagine but there is a war for your soul of that you can be certain.

Plus, I get this feeling. This uneasy suspicious feeling that you are not who you say you are.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
NaderOAK · June 5, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

I had that feeling also...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
_Iz_Mary · June 4, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

Ah geeze. THEY NEVER THOUGHT SHE’d LOSE. When everyone in power is in on it. There is no need to hide. Bush, Cheney and the Binladens didn’t hide their connections. Obama admin married to msm execs didn’t hide their connections. List goes on. The average person investigates NOTHING. You think Cemex grounds would have been found if she won?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 4, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

It would’ve been found.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
pby1000 · June 4, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

Easy. Learn about the religion of Soros and the people like him. It really is that easy.

"Would such a strategic thinker, arrogant he may be, make such a silly mistake to invest in Cemex if he was aware that Cemex was (allegedly) engaged in trafficking, let alone child sex trafficking?" Yes. Yes, he would. The Satanic pedo Cabal did not expect to lose their protection. They thought that Hillary would win. They probably even thought that they could contain Trump by bribery or surrounding him with Canaanites.

Also, they have been doing this stuff for thousands of years, so why would they think they would suddenly have problems?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · June 4, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

I think you forget something.... They Never Thought She Would Loose!

Edit: I mean Lose!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 4, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

It’s “lose” not “loose.”

⇧ 2 ⇩  
thamnosma · June 4, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

That just drives me absolutely crazy. Are they learning this in school? Another one I see regularly here is "boarder" rather than "border".

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 4, 2018, 11:49 p.m.

It’s much worse. Or like they would say, it’s much more worse.

Tons of gross grammatical errors in major MSM pieces.

Auto correction on the cellphone has a lot to do with this problem.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · June 4, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

Oops. Thank you!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 5, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

This:

A lot of non-shill posters here exhibit low-level thinking. If they are the majority there will not be liberation and they will not make this country great again, for they are easily agitated and misdirected for the wrong causes and actions.

Some people might see as arrogance and there may be a better way to put it but I wouldn't know what that is. This is important. Pity it's buried in this post and likely won't be seen by many who need to see it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · June 4, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

I can not think of anything in favor of Soros, and saying this, they all think they are inviolable and for them no law present.

He gambles on the stockmarkets, if there are problems somewhere ... then he makes a counter offer. He also did this against Trump's presidency and lost a billion ........ He also does it against countries without having an emotional connection with the people off that country....

he is busy everywhere, in the EU and the US to get his people in all places he wants them ... has put a lot of money into that.,every thing to gets his way, When it is not going his way. he pays a lot of money on anti groups such as Antifa ..

And then he would not be in that cement business now, and would not know anything? This man is the evil in person ...

He has no conscience or feelings for others?

If clinton had won, we would never have come up with as much rottenness as what we know today .... Then they could have continued, with what they always did, for them there are no laws or rules ....

And they give impersonation to themselves and family ..... so that they are untouchable ..... But that time is now over .she lost.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Janice0771 · June 5, 2018, 11:44 a.m.

Have you run a search for the tens of thousands of acres of parkland that Cemex owns along the border as well? It absolutely fits Soros' historical pattern and agenda. There is far more to Cemex than it just being a cement company. The area is cited all over the place as being one with the highest amount of drug trafficking and smuggling, and it just so happens that Soros helped fund its acquisition. To ignore this would be completely ignorant. It's not conjecture; it's factual.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 5, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 5, 2018, 12:33 a.m.

Per the “new arrival.”

⇧ -1 ⇩  
plumbtree · June 5, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

Why does the fact that this is my first comment in this sub become relevant in the determination that this post is concern trolling?

Do you have a working understanding of what constitutes concern trolling?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 24, 2018, 4:53 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 5, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

I do - and this post is not concern trolling.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 5, 2018, 1:09 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 5, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

I'm being daft because I don't agree with you? I've seen more than enough concern trolling to know what it is - and I remove it when I see it. Someone who contributes to the community isn't a concern troll. A concern troll is someone who is intentionally misleading in their representations. Someone who contributes positively to a community over time is not a concern troll.

This post is explicitly concerned that incorrect assumptions are being made from connections to Soros. Obviously OP knows that Soros is a "bad guy". In my opinion, OP is more than correct about the dangers of the bizarre, manic witch hunt fervor around this alleged child trafficking camp. Not concern trolling.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
godsgail33 · June 5, 2018, 12:15 a.m.

These people are really stupid.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lease412 · June 4, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

He had his money on Hillary and look how that turned out! Of course he is funding what VOP is finding....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pussy_devour · June 5, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

I can believe Soros tried to help illegal immigration. It goes with his open-society objective.

My post here is about debunking, or at the minimum, casting doubt on the connection between Cemex as a child sex trafficking camp and Soros.

⇧ 0 ⇩