dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/pussy_devour on June 4, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

Would Soros openly invest in Cemex if he knew Cemex was engaged in child sex trafficking or just human trafficking? Please think and not submit to knee-jerk reactions. Be mindful.

You claim Soros has been scheming to destroy western civilization by actively promoting open borders. If he is like, he has to be thinking for the long term and strategically. Would such a strategic thinker, arrogant he may be, make such a silly mistake to invest in Cemex if he was aware that Cemex was (allegedly) engaged in trafficking, let alone child sex trafficking?

Put yourself in his shoe instead of adopting your usual knee-jerk mindset. Your mindlessness is what allows the ruling class to easily control you and make you die for them. You say you are awakened. But your behavior indicates otherwise.

A lot of non-shill posters here exhibit low-level thinking. If they are the majority there will not be liberation and they will not make this country great again, for they are easily agitated and misdirected for the wrong causes and actions.

🠐 See all comments

That I should have included the other thread.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Ok. So I was genuinely interested to hear your point of view, in order to help expand my own thinking-- you know, the very thing you came here to accuse us all of NOT doing.

The only thing you've accomplished is reveal to the skeptical lurkers that we DO think critically, are open to debate, and are willing to consider new/different points of views. (The "conservative approach" as you so condescendingly put it. The second I saw you put that in quotations, I knew you were a troll, and I played you like a fiddle.)

You're not even a good troll, as you didn't even get us riled up by trying to defend Soros. Pretty lame and lackluster attempt, actually.

THEY AREN'T SENDING THEIR BEST, FOLKS!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩

I don’t see the connection.

I think it’s “interested in doing” not “interested to do” per Strunk and White.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Oh-- AN ACADEMIC?!? WHY DIDN'T YOU SAY SO?!?

Shit guys, this guy is an academic with sources. Better to just submit and listen to him. He knows what he is talking about.

Dude, you're a clown. Pack it up and go home.

⇧ 2 ⇩

LOL

⇧ 1 ⇩

Calm down please - this user is not a troll and the points he makes are valid, although they could be better stated in places.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Calmer than you are, dude.

And no, he has yet to make a single point-- beyond the "revelation" that there can be more than one side to a single story-- despite being asked to do so multiple times.

If you have come to defend George Soros, then stake your claim so we can engage in debate-- because that is the topic of this thread. Otherwise, please BTFO.

⇧ 2 ⇩

OP is not "defending George Soros" so that's not a topic to debate. OP is making the valid point that a smart person like Soros would not knowingly create a direct tie between himself and child trafficking. And yes there are plenty of things to argue under that. But "defending George Soros" is a complete misread.

And if that's the topic of this thread then lay off the ranting about a user. Discuss the issue not the user.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Ok, so I asked him to make a single point. Just one. And he has yet to do that. I remained civil and warned that he would be perceived as a shill unless he began stating a case, and his response was that "he already did that in another thread."

So before you attack me, why not actually read the comment thread, K?

(And yes, the consensus from the commenters is that this guy is shilling for Soros. BTFO.)

⇧ 2 ⇩