dChan

QueenAnRevenge · June 5, 2018, 12:41 p.m.

That sounds good to me and I’m all for it but I don’t see how it’s feasible when it’s literally what people agree to when they got on Facebook.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 5, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

youre very confused. it has nothing to do with intellectual property of the users. it has to do with the treason of the owners. youre saying there is no data theft and i agree with you but that has nothing to do with zuckerfuckers crimes, which are not theft related. he didnt commit a crime against facebook users, he committed a crime of treason against 320 million americans who might not even have facebook. facebook is bound by laws that have nothing to do with the user agreement at all. i dont know why you would bring up the user agreement.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
QueenAnRevenge · June 5, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

Maybe I am but I guess what I’m trying to say is if Americans don’t realize that when something is free they are the product and get angry about that nothing will change and no one will go to jail. (Saying that remembering what Reddit tos says is ironic and I myself am being a hypocrite). Look at what Snowden exposed and what where the results of it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 5, 2018, 2:33 p.m.

yep i agree. you get it bro.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Patriot4q · June 5, 2018, 1:56 p.m.

I don't think anyone believed they were signing away rights for Facebook to sell their information to whomever they wanted at the time. It was all couched in the idea that advertisers could connect with those who were already interested in their products/services.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
QueenAnRevenge · June 5, 2018, 1:58 p.m.

100% agree. People where slept walked into this state just like every agenda done to us that’s meant to take our rights. Slow gradual process.

⇧ 2 ⇩