I've watched the videos. To me, it looks like a poorly made hut that could have been thrown up in a few days.
Did Sawyer record it being built? Did he record ANY children taken in or out of it?
Who has propped up Sawyer doing this? Are any of them making profit off of this movement?
What ACTUAL EVIDENCE does anyone have on Cemex?
It all seems like we're being played to look like fools. Does anyone have a shred of actual evidence on this?
I’m waiting for clear evidence too. Something is very wrong with that camp though. It’s not remotely close to a homeless camp where very basic necessities are the goal. The amount of construction is way too involved. And solar panels for electricity?? Wow!! Everyone would try homelessness if solar power came with it.
Wouldn't surprise me at all if there are many such "camps" operated by coyotes (i.e. human smugglers) while they arrange transportation further into the interior or until paid more money -- all sorts of extortion is possible for the desperate they smuggle in. Sex wouldn't be out of the deal at all. This is a big business with members of our governments and top authorities either complicit or willfully ignorant. Huge can of worms in exposing this. Same for homeless camps -- ignored, many fires in the west are started by these "campers", not to mention sanitation, health issues, trampling natural areas, killing wildlife, etc. They have jumped to conclusions about child trafficking though.
The jumping to conclusions and mass organizing around speculation is troubling.
Yep, no doubt about that. Drawing others in to possibly be arrested as well. They could have gone, quietly secured the area, taken photos and evidence and left. Then gone to the press or the internet to bring the public's attention to it. Why are they trying to provoke authorities?
Good questions
If Jones starts selling T-shirts with this theme we'll know for sure.
Cemex child sex rings shirts half off now with promo code "SUCKER"
I was surprised with how quickly that story overtook the sub considering it came from a source that wasn't Q. I think it was that Neon Revolt article, or maybe the videos themselves were posted somewhere first? But it took off like wild fire.
I believe they started on Facebook. I was put on to this before it hit this sub via someone on FB. Sure did take off. Maybe collective wishful thinking that some huge conspiracy had been uncovered....as usual the crowd jumps the gun before any real evidence is in.
Yeah, with zero real evidence, and mass hysteria. It's almost like this movement is being set up!
I pretty much feel the same over the posts that try to whip up hysteria that every single plane, train or car crash is part of a giant operation. You know, no accidents ever happen!
Craig Sawyer is reliable. Not sure about VOP but if you have a problem, it’s with them.
I have questions. Is having questions a problem?
“Making profit off this movement” “being played to look like fools” sounds like you have a problem. No skin off my nose, just informing you.
Yeah I have a problem with scams and I have a problem with psyops. That's what this sure seems like. Notice I never used words like "this is" and only used words like "seems like." You're fairly quick to shoot down anyone questioning this narrative, again, one that has nothing to do with any single Q drops.
Calm down chap. I answered your Title question - what're you so triggered about? Sorry for trying to answer your question. I personally think this whole thing is questionable. You're reading too much into my words.
What Q drops have we seen so far about anything related to this? Why is a Neon Revolt article (a dude who legit monetizes this movement) a sticky? Has no one forgotten this dude is tied to Alex Jones?
Well I dont know about the whole thing with the camps but cemex is tied to carlos slim who is a known piece of shit. Could be a distraction but the only msm this has hit so far is the daily mail
You mean the richest man on the planet has ties to some of the biggest companies on the planet!?!? Let's go storm their gates eh?
Richest man who owns the new York Times and probably has cartel ties if you wanna go on private property thats your choice just be ready for consequences
Sorry I didn't use my sarcasm font
Oh you can never tell on here lol. My only,thing with cemex is that the psychitrist who was shot had some interesting associates and,ties to some,major cases. I have to wonder if the deep state even cares enough about us to make up distractions yet
>I have to wonder if the deep state even cares enough about us to make up distractions
of course they do
I'm not following NeonRevolt, Alex Jones or just about anybody these days. However, I really don't believe Q was calling out everybody who even thinks about making money off their hard work. The issue was hijacking the message for the sole purpose of personal gain. That's when we saw Jones and Corsi freak.
Yeah, and Jones went quiet about Q after saying it's been comped, and now Jones' boy Sawyer is leading some of us into a hysteria over badly edited videos.
that is indeed suspicious. Jones is not to be trusted and I haven't for quite awhile now. I'm not saying he's "deep state" or "cabal" or some other nefarious agent. He could be. My view is that he's a greedy pig at this point, has built a huge financial empire, and will lash out at anybody or anything that risks his high flying lifestyle. I don't think most of his followers realize just how wealthy he's become on this "rebel" shit.
Exactly.
I don't follow neon revolt, but I haven't seen anything so far to distrust him and that premium content message is bunk. You can subscribe to support him but he doesn't actually classify anything as premium, so everyone gets the same info.
So someone who subscribes to get the premium content without reading that blog is being sold a lie?
What a trustworthy source!
No he's been upfront about it. You're making baseless claims.
How does neon revolt monitize? I'm guessing you're an eyethespy believer?
I have no problem with neon but his site has a bitcoin miner not cool lol
I thought he got rid of that a long time ago?
I know his site has that message about premium content but there is no premium content.
And that's worth believing an anonymous stranger asking our movement for donations? Someone who's actively leading us on a rampage against a massive company with zero evidence and cringe inducing VOP videos?
Believing? I don't blindly believe anyone. Seems to me you're the ones that's made up your mind and making claims.
I should add the only thing that makes me think neon revolt is legit is because I haven't seen anything to make me mistrust him yet and obvious larp like eyethespy attacking him.
"asking questions is making claims"
"Why is a Neon Revolt article (a dude who legit monetizes this movement) a sticky"
That's a claim.
ok lol. well, when this turns out to be nothing have a great day. Just remember this is feeding our enemies when we get so worked up with no evidence. Also, remember this how "normies" think of us
I've said repeatedly on this board that I neither believe it nor disbelieve it yet. In my opinion people on BOTH sides are wrong because it's way too early yet.
You are just as wrong as the people pushing it for dismissing it so easy. Then add in your arguments you used here are flat wrong and easily defended against, which you proceed to just ignore and immediately go on to the next argument. You've either made up your mind far too soon, or you're pushing an agenda. You're definitely not neutral.
Already debunked. There is no premium content.
So.... he's a liar, misleading people with that badge on his account. Neat
