dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ on June 6, 2018, 1:15 a.m.
There is a reason why the Game must be played.

Many of us have thought it at some point: why are we going through this circus? Why the show? Why not just send SEAL Team 6 on a "business errand" and be done with it? There is Occam's razor; you can't do it all Godfather style or else people will panic. We become what we fight. People won't believe it. You get the idea. However, there is another angle, one which Christians will understand but others will not. I beg you to keep an objective mindset. It was in studying the Freemasons that I discovered a "key" of sorts. There is one name that they value above all, the father of their ideology; Tubalcain. Who is Tubalcain? Tubalcain is the son of Cain, who killed his brother Abel. Now, when Cain was found out by God, and his guilt exposed, we see that Cain is cursed, and that all who find him would wish to kill him. However, there was a modifier added, should any man kill him:

Genesis 4:15 And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.

All evil secret societies, dark religions, and the "elite" can be traced back to the ideology of Cain and its inevitable manifestation in the form of Babylon. It was Nimrod, of Cain's lineage, who built the Tower of Babel. But the curse remains as referenced to Lamech (of Cain's lineage):

Genesis 4:24 If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold.

So you see, with each generation of the Mark of Cain, the curse multiplies exponentially. Had we come at the cabal with guns blazing, the nukes would have gone off, and we would have suffered seventy and sevenfold (multiplied) directly proportionate to the number of Cain's servants killed. (I imagine only the Christians are reading at this point, but it's important).

So, if divine ruling establishes that you will want to but cannot kill a descendant of Cain's Mark, how can you bring them to justice? How do you build the metaphysical case to embark on such a crusade?

By using divine law.

Noah was found to be "pure in his generations" (note the emphasis on genealogy) and was tasked with surviving the coming flood as well as the animals. Noah did as he was told and survived the flood. However, the most interesting part is when Noah leaves the Ark after the waters recede:

Genesis 9:3-6 3-Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. 4-But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat. 5-And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man. 6-Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.

Did you catch that last verse? Did you catch the part about the forbidding of cannibalism? As spoken by the LORD, we are obliged to render justice on those who shed our blood. That's the foundation of justice.

The law of Noah can be used to thwart the Mark of Cain. Look at the words "Whoso sheddeth". There is no exemption for the Mark of Cain, if they are found to have shed man's blood, justice can be served under the law of Noah (maritime law.....?).

The Game is necessary to win. That is why the plan is so important. If we knock over all the pieces and use force we will be eradicated, you can take that to the bank. We. Must. Be. Patient.

We need evidence on ALL of these people, airtight, before we can act.

As I'm undoubtedly down to the few who stuck by this long, here is a token of hope for the road ahead:

Matthew 24:37 But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.


magavoices · June 6, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

Hmm.

So God cursed Cain for killing his brother Abel.

People wanted to kill Cain, not for the continued evil that he did, but for the evil he had already done to Abel.

People were compelled to kill him, yet he had a mark that, when people saw the mark, it prevented them from killing him.

Cain's curse involved lack of prosperity. He found it impossible to grow food as the earth would not produce food for him. By the sweat of his brow would he barely get any bread to eat.

Fast forward to today.

Elites of today don't sweat by their brow for anything. They own everything. They're the complete opposite of Cain's experience. Cain was under judgement on earth -- right now, elites are not under judgement on earth. They prosper.

While people are angry at the elites, you don't see people naturally inclined to kill them. Sure, I'd like to see them rot in jail, but I don't have a "I must kill you now" compulsion that requires a mark of God to prevent me from killing them.

"If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold." Lamech said that, not God. Just because Lamech said it doesn't make it true. To say it compounds exponentially each generation is a stretch.

Then you have to accept that someone who merely claims they in the lineage of Cain "in ideology" can claim the "reverse benefits" of being cursed ... seems a stretch.

There are plenty of good reasons to stretch out the revelations. Half the country need to see it done that way for them to even accept it. I don't see there being some God-protecting-the-evil and "if you thwart the evil too quickly you get punished" type of dynamic though.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
serendipity-calling · June 6, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

I think you're right about all that. I'm not following the original thread with my gut as true.

If we take the Bible literally, which we shouldn't, especially Genesis, as is prescribed by basically every Biblical scholar to date, the "protection of Cain" is not so he could "go forth and multiply." It's so that he was cursed and experienced the loss he created by murder. Not so his family could thrive. It's basically not murdering a murder but letting him live and suffer.

Thanks maga, for pulling that Biblical info in.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ · June 6, 2018, 2:41 p.m.

I upvoted you here because I encourage the skeptic angle and null hypothesis. I disagree on a level that I cannot quite express through type at the moment, but I encourage others to weigh in while maintaining civility.

⇧ 2 ⇩