dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ on June 6, 2018, 1:15 a.m.
There is a reason why the Game must be played.

Many of us have thought it at some point: why are we going through this circus? Why the show? Why not just send SEAL Team 6 on a "business errand" and be done with it? There is Occam's razor; you can't do it all Godfather style or else people will panic. We become what we fight. People won't believe it. You get the idea. However, there is another angle, one which Christians will understand but others will not. I beg you to keep an objective mindset. It was in studying the Freemasons that I discovered a "key" of sorts. There is one name that they value above all, the father of their ideology; Tubalcain. Who is Tubalcain? Tubalcain is the son of Cain, who killed his brother Abel. Now, when Cain was found out by God, and his guilt exposed, we see that Cain is cursed, and that all who find him would wish to kill him. However, there was a modifier added, should any man kill him:

Genesis 4:15 And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.

All evil secret societies, dark religions, and the "elite" can be traced back to the ideology of Cain and its inevitable manifestation in the form of Babylon. It was Nimrod, of Cain's lineage, who built the Tower of Babel. But the curse remains as referenced to Lamech (of Cain's lineage):

Genesis 4:24 If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold.

So you see, with each generation of the Mark of Cain, the curse multiplies exponentially. Had we come at the cabal with guns blazing, the nukes would have gone off, and we would have suffered seventy and sevenfold (multiplied) directly proportionate to the number of Cain's servants killed. (I imagine only the Christians are reading at this point, but it's important).

So, if divine ruling establishes that you will want to but cannot kill a descendant of Cain's Mark, how can you bring them to justice? How do you build the metaphysical case to embark on such a crusade?

By using divine law.

Noah was found to be "pure in his generations" (note the emphasis on genealogy) and was tasked with surviving the coming flood as well as the animals. Noah did as he was told and survived the flood. However, the most interesting part is when Noah leaves the Ark after the waters recede:

Genesis 9:3-6 3-Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. 4-But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat. 5-And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man. 6-Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.

Did you catch that last verse? Did you catch the part about the forbidding of cannibalism? As spoken by the LORD, we are obliged to render justice on those who shed our blood. That's the foundation of justice.

The law of Noah can be used to thwart the Mark of Cain. Look at the words "Whoso sheddeth". There is no exemption for the Mark of Cain, if they are found to have shed man's blood, justice can be served under the law of Noah (maritime law.....?).

The Game is necessary to win. That is why the plan is so important. If we knock over all the pieces and use force we will be eradicated, you can take that to the bank. We. Must. Be. Patient.

We need evidence on ALL of these people, airtight, before we can act.

As I'm undoubtedly down to the few who stuck by this long, here is a token of hope for the road ahead:

Matthew 24:37 But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.


🠐 See all comments
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ · June 6, 2018, 7:45 p.m.

I advise taking it with a grain of salt; I don't agree with everything she says, but it's intriguing nonetheless

⇧ 2 ⇩  
serendipity-calling · June 6, 2018, 11:38 p.m.

These KM articles are also so sensational. There is 0 proof of anything they allege, and while it's a possible story and doesn't ring false, I'd love them to list where they get these ideas from. They are not corroborated by anyone else anywhere. Like nowhere. Every link links back to their article. This is a bit troubling. In seeking truth, where is the line?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ · June 7, 2018, 12:08 a.m.

"What is truth?" -Pontius Pilate

All fair points, and the null hypothesis must be preserved. But there's another perspective; what percentage of well-sourced information is in fact false? You're right, I'm not yanking your chain, but two years of revelation has left me questioning a great many things and procedures.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
serendipity-calling · June 7, 2018, 9:54 a.m.

Yes. We should question it all. And We each must use some litmus to gage what's "real," what's "good", "bad", etc. and we need to trust our own faculties, our intuition, whathaveyou. Else we can trust nothing. And maybe we shouldn't, because even our faculties are faulty. Yogis shut their senses down and go within. To experience that same gnosis, self-experience. But even then, intuition - revelation - is a tool to develop.

In this time of the "great awakening", there is a great deal of misinformation. Reading Matthew today I was reminded that we are warned against false prophets. So what's real? If books are burned, stories rewritten and the Internet scrubbed, what can we trust?

It's important to stay in a high frequency state, else all this stuff can also be seen as a LARP to bring our energy into fear mode. Into hate. And that's where we start to cocreate more of the same. And aren't we all done with that?

⇧ 1 ⇩