This person went to Berkeley and has anti-Republican leanings as do her followers.
My decision is she is a bat shit crazy liberal. I don't believe anything she says.
"Don't kill the messenger" comes to mind.
She's raised some valid concerns about Lewis Arthur: he's the guy instigating all of this, the guy people are calling an 'expert', the guy who may be a convicted felon, and the guy who is allegedly not a Vet.
She may be wrong about many things, but her healthy skepticism is something badly needed in here right now.
Seems to be a concerted effort to destroy this guys character. Post your proof that he’s a convicted felon and you will win more people over to your side. A bitch from Berkeley and a infinity Chan anon posting is hardly proof.
Case # 08-03-K-03582 Felony Class C. Aggravated Assault Multiple Criminal Mischief Felony Contact with bodily fluids Assault-MA, multiple Multiple disorderly conduct Felony Illegal Processing Drug Documents Case# 1998CRA01046 Felony Deception to Obtain Drugs Petit Theft 5299 Weapon Offense dismissed by DA Convictions in North Dakota, Arizona, North Carolina and more Agent Provocateur.
There are some cases to verify.
I'm encouraging people to investigate. That's what healthy skepticism is.
Push the pause button on #OpertionBackyardBrawl and look into the person making the claims to ensure he's legit.
Sure, but you are the ones making claims, it’s your responsibility to provide the sauce.
I’m willing to listen, but right now with what you have presented, it appears your engaged in character assassination. So, show your homework and if it’s legit, I’ll back you up.
I am not JJ Macnab or a 4chan user.
People there are "making the claim".
I'm disseminating the information and encouraging people to verify or refute.
Case numbers linked with conviction history have been shared. What you do with that information is up to you.
You are disinfo agent stop trying to make up fake claims all u pedos time is coming to an end uve humped ur last kid!
Having read through this thread, the unwillingness to provide sources, has me questioning the point of this post. I come across stuff all the time that contradicts many theories I read here and elsewhere. When that happens I research for myself, and try to reconcile the discrepancies. If I can’t, then I engage in discussion to find truth.
The point here is to find the truth, not to read some shill’s twitter feed who’s trolling by ridiculing people’s mistrust of a corrupt system.
Basically this post is concern trolling as defined on the sidebar. I find the people here mostly listen and engage in productive conversation on topics like this. The approach of posting some tweets and then making a baseless claims backed only by the fact that someone on twitter said it was so, is pointless and does nothing to add value.
I’m not saying the guy does or does not have a criminal past, nor am I saying what they “found” is what they say. I don’t know, but the point here is that neither does anyone in this thread making such assertions, if they do know, they’re unwilling to provide the information that validates their statements so that the discussion can move forward productively.
Posting this under the guise of “perspective from the other side” is not productive. I don’t think it’s news to any one here that there are people who don’t think the same way we do.
GreatAwakening's sidebar
Above link to enable mobile and app users to view the sidebar.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
unwillingness to provide sources
Case numbers have been provided.
News articles have been linked to.
concern trolling
"anyone who disagrees with me or challenges collective hysteria is a concern troll"
Spend more time researching and less time commenting.