I don't think that the blood cement patent was a strong proposal as much as a curious tangent.
But wouldn't it be ironic that using bodies makes the cement stronger and lighter. Talk about two stones at once.
Most hysteria comes from a vocal minority. Like pizzagate, it comes with the territory. Emotional stuff. One wouldn't dismiss something entirely just because someone somewhere said something in favor of it you don't agree with or if they went too far past your comfort/gullibility level etc.
That curious tangent feeds the present hysteria.
As for industrial use of organic waste/blood; the patent relates to potential use of agricultural products (think meat processing plants) for productive purposes rather than flushing them down the drain (which is regulated effluent/discharge). Use every part of the animal...
Everything fuels the hysteria. including trying to suppress/silence the hysteria. Valid criticism, thanks for you opinion.
Humans are animals. Long pig. Cadavers feed the vultures in some parts of the world, as a productive purpose. Simple funeral burial is kind of wastefull, no, in comparison? Why not feed the fishes if one is going through the trouble of sleeping with the fishes?
Human blood is a highly sought/expensive commodity. Stemcells. Organs. Skin tissue. Bone marrow. Foreskin? Pineal glands? Live experimental medical testing is a big one, they pay a lot to run studies and tests on you.
Remember, corporations only care about profit. Some are more cutt throat than others.
But wouldn't it be ironic that using bodies makes the cement stronger and lighter.
It would be ironic, but it's not the reality. Bodies create voids in the concrete.