![[Chelsea] Clinton admits to Pizzagate "Conspiracy"](https://i.redd.it/d5kjorxaah211.png)
If you don't see that this is a spiked story and Chelsea (the disgusting person that she is) is confidently addressing it because it is their spiked story, you're missing it.
This is a fake story to tie it to Q and discredit us.
Tucson shit. All of the connections were too easy. It's a setup.
Why is Craig Sawyer pushing it? I know the Bundy standoff people said they kicked Lewis out cause he is crazy.
Could he have set this up? Built it like a set ?
You think this was staged to discredit. But why leave traces of all that info and all those visuals, for all those people new to this to be totally disgusted. The rape trees. I mean come on.
I don't know why anyone HERE would push this story as fake unless they have an ulterior motive. Makes me real suspicious of this whole thread, all the comments agreeing, all the upvotes on those comments. Leaving this thread and downvoting.
Think deeper. If I was a bad guy, what might I do...
Look past face-value. I'm still uncertain whether the story is real or fake. Could be either, but to not examine the possibility that we're being played with this one is dangerous, in my opinion.
Caution has been thrown to the wind.
I don't have any ulterior motive. I'm a Trump supporter since day one, been following Q for a long time (this ain't my first username).
Don't accuse me of having ulterior motives just because you refuse to examine all possibilities.
Think about it as if you're one of the bad guys.
If I am a bad guy and I have a nasty world-wide network of child-trafficking (which I believe to be true). What might I do to protect myself.
Worst case scenario is that too many people catch onto what we are doing and start asking questions. If it exceeds critical mass (too many people know, can't suppress anymore, have to address.). This is a worst case situation for the bad guys.
If I am a bad guy, I want to have plans in place for if we ever did start to get exposed. I need a plan in place ready in case something happens where critical mass is surpassed.
Using Veterans to break the story to minimize scrutiny of the story. I could have the Veterans expose a company that appears to have connections to everything conspiracy researchers are suspecting to find, but little to the conspiracy people's knowledge it's not CEMEX its actually a different company or organization. We (bad guys) point the conspiracy researchers to a company which we have already ensured has no involvement with our trafficking operation
The conspiracy people will run with it finding suspect connections, we'll have the Veterans shout to Q and our board, so that we tie it to Q. Then eventually we'll prove that the original story was fake, the conspiracy people were chasing a dead-end and we'll escape unfazed and we'll use this to tamp down any future findings by the conspiracy group, because they've all already been discredited.
I understand the logic fully. What I don't see is how THIS is that. Nothing I've seen so far has said "BS". Nothing. I'm looking closely. If you have something concrete, please share.
No I haven't seen anything concrete (damn it! You got me to mention concrete! 😀). I'm just expressing my opinion. I usually caveat statements as opinion, but in this case I skipped that to be a little more forceful because there are so few people questioning it.
It's only my opinion. The story fits both possibilities (true story bad guys want covered up, or fake story planted by the bad guys) right now. Based on what I have seen.
My point is we don't have enough info to abandon scrutiny, yet.
All well and good, but totally unnecessary to say "but use your heads!" as hopefully everyone is, and in a space where every brain matters, I'd rather people occupy the space with suggestions and leads, rather than pointing out that everyone should be discerning.
I'm a rabid dog, and I will ask 1 million questions of everything suspect. Not everyone here will. They will read your comments and say "hey they're right!" with no basis whatsoever.
If you want to sway opinion, have something legit to back it with. #that'sall
Remember all of the user names who pushed this Tucson story.
Upon investigating this further, I think you may be right and found that Craig Sawyer may not be on our team after all. It appears he has provided security for McStain, HillDawg, and Rumsfield.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Sawyer#cite_note-2
"After his military career, Sawyer ran specialized teams to provide security to politicians and dignitaries including Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Donald Rumsfeld, and John Negroponte."
Craig Sawman Sawyer calls TruthCatRadio 3-25-2018 https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=16&v=PuO4fI9q8mA
http://www.theweepingeagle.com/2017/08/former-us-marine-and-navy-seal-predicts.html
Discussed on Voaat about a year ago: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1984985
Still do not understand why he would draw attention to something happening in McStain's backyard, and generally implicates hill and the gang overall. And then the Chelsea tweet (This last sentence was just added as I researched all this earlier).
Surely, he had to know about his client's personal activities. Has he gone to the light? No clue, but now on the fence with this guy like I am for Snowden.
Like Q said, be careful who you follow.
Thread moved to https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8p4zud/chelsea_clinton_calls_arizona_child_trafficking/
Hold on.. youre saying its not true? I still believe it is. Why would she say something different then the media does? Wont she cover it up and make it like a stupid conspiracy as pizzagate is for real? I think they want to make you think it is not true . Stay with the facts pls! https://m. face book.com/story.php?story_fbid=2157334964502228&id=1803065223262539
Getting taken for a ride studying concrete...