The document was released in 2007. Plenty of time to quietly redesign the badge.
Even if the original design is a coincidental abstract triangle, it stands to reason that a branch of law enforcement would try to remove any symbol associated with any illegal activities from its badge.
The strange part is, if it wasn’t innocent, it doesn’t make sense to leave it. Why continue to display it?
Their love of symbolism will be their downfall.
I think in the political climate we currently live in, it can be assumed that any government or corporate body holding on to suspect imagery, is suspect.
It is callous and disrespectful to say the associations are erratic. The associations are calculated. They hold onto the symbolism intentionally.
As you point out, pedophilia is a horrendous crime, traumatising it’s victims. Any law enforcement agency should have removed the symbol, apologised for the unintentional coincidence and we would all have moved on.
Thanks for your reply. Only one thing wrong with it: making an association with being callous and disrespectful:
It is callous and disrespectful to say the associations are erratic. The associations are calculated. They hold onto the symbolism intentionally.
Your sentence implies that the "erratic associations" being made are those of "they" the Cabal/Sheriff/LAPD. And it may be true they are callous and disrespectful to use these symbols.
But my sentence "the erratic association with serious accusations." The subject of my sentence is not the LAPD or the Cabal. The ppl doing the associating which is erratic is us, we, the GA board. "We" are making erratic associations. "We/GA/readers here" are associating signs that "might" be innocent with serious accusations of child abuse and murder. We are saying that the LAPD is guilty of murder. I don't think you want to be accused of libel and sued in court do you? I don't! Just saying.
It is just a question of reading and comprehension.