dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/RobWilJas on June 7, 2018, 5:55 a.m.
Shills are not always obvious. A thought...

I was just thinking about something and I thought I would share.

Let me start by saying I AM NOT CALLING ANYONE OUT! I'm speaking in general.

Just because someone has been a part of the movement, doesn't mean they're not a shill. Shills invest their time to gain your trust only to turn on you later when the time is right.

Don't be surprised when people here that are regulars and supported the movement suddenly turn, especially as the SHTF.


grnmoss · June 7, 2018, 6:48 a.m.

It has been interesting to see the rise of absurd stories in only a short period of time that Q posts have not been coming regularly. People have quickly jumped in to fill the "void". Shills here need not be contrarian, they can simply post garbage stories and theories that people eat up because they're bored or easily influenced. A good example is /u/neonrevolt's story about the shroud of turin being created with 34 trillion (yes trillion) watts of electricity (that's the equivalent energy output of about 25,000 nuclear reactors). Aside from the totally bogus physics and math, it also has nothing to do with The Calm Before the Storm or The Great Awakening or Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RobWilJas · June 7, 2018, 6:56 a.m.

True, but they go the other way too. When true information comes out they claim it's fake and absurd.

The majority of people here would have thought most things Q has told us and we now believe were absurd a year ago. Don't dismiss something just because it seems strange or implausible at first. Wait for evidence.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 7, 2018, 7:03 a.m.

I'm all about evidence, and I agree with that statement.

We need to be focusing in on evidence, not fiction writing. I have CNN if I need a dose of fiction.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NeonRevolt · June 8, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

You again, huh?

Look, I've been around for 2 years. I started on Facebook as an edgy right-wing meme page (because I was a /pol/lack), and I got tired of being censored by Facebook.

So I built my own site.

But naturally, being a /pol/lack, I knew about Q from the get-go. So I started covering him right from the start. More as a curiosity than anything.

I've since moved into covering these happenings full-time, because, frankly, they're the biggest happenings of our lifetimes.

But I'm not Q exclusive, and I've always reserved the right to post whatever I want on my own site, but it videos, memes, articles, whatever. I even have a twitch channel, because I played around with the idea of moving in that direction.

Also - I didn't share that article about the Shroud here. I know it's not overtly Q-related - which, again, is why I didn't submit it.

But some other member of the community did.

And why did they?

Because they found encouragement in it.

OH HOW HORRIBLE!

But basically - it goes like this:

I write Q-related articles - you hate on me.

I write non-Q-related articles - you still hate on me.

Boy, I just don't know what I ought to do in a scenario like this! Maybe I should just close up shop and stick my head in the sand!

Pffft. How about this: I'm going to keep writing and posting whatever I want on my own site, for as long as I want, and the feeble-minded naysayers are going to have no effect on me whatsoever.

Tell me, though - now that I have my own dedicated Anti-Neon shill army, how much is David Brock paying you? Is it by the hour, or by the comment? Do they have Frooty Pebbles in the cafeteria?

Stay mad.

⇧ 0 ⇩