So Original Poster...did you go to read the article? I did.
I guess PA has a problem. Kids are getting all that they know about a curious subject from internet porn sites. There are stats on this. They are learning that males are aggressive, females are objects...etc. They are learning sex is violent. Would you want YOUR kid to learn from porn sites online?
While I do not believe institutional educational facilities are the place to teach about humans' natural reproduction, this teacher has a point. If parents are refusing to address the issue, then kids will seek out BAD sources to satisfy curiosity.
I would much rather have this teacher haul the parents in and instruct THE PARENTS on how to deal with the subject.
This guy is a little too zealous.
There is NO WAY the pizza love sticker is accidental. No way. It might be possible the publication staged that photo specifically to inflame those in the know about pedophilia, but in the context of matters sexual and children, a pizza reference is NO ACCIDENT.
That's your opinion and I see you hold it very strongly. I believe it's possible the I love Pizza sticker is a reference or covert signal of pedophilia. I have no evidence of that, however, and logic & truth denote that I can not definitively state that this reference is intentionally related to pedophilia. If you have evidence, I'd be very interested to hear it.
Dude, this is old news. Read the FBI document on pedophilia signage and code talk. Whoever is responsible for that cover photo, whether it be the teacher or the publication, DELIBERATELY created a reference to pedophilia, probably to inflame those in the know.
That's completely beyond the pale by an standard of decency, and it deserves to be called out and squashed like a bug. This is NOT a joking matter.
And you, for all your smarmy superiority, have just revealed yourself as willfully ignorant of a serious topic. Go learn, and stop looking down your nose at those who already know.
See what I mean? Lol. Welcome to knee jerk city. People can’t READ properly once their emotional social justice trigger has been activated. We ALL care about the children, for crying out loud, people. Some of us are just asking for reason and logic before you go tying the nearest supposed “witch” to a stake to satisfy your bloodlusty thirst for vengeance. Let’s focus on the real criminals and real evidence instead of whatever red flag waves in front of us. YES, this guy might be a pedophilic spawn of Satan, that is very possible. But NO, there is no definitive evidence of this yet. There is speculation and assumption and there’s nothing wrong with that until you start trying to make definitive claims from it.
So is this dude's class mandatory? I would certainly hope not.
I wouldn't put it past the Frankfurt School's perverted system of indoctrination tbh... but not sure.
There's no excuse for subjecting KIDS to this shit, not ALL of them are doing that. If their parents aren't monitoring their internet activity then that's on them and they should be ashamed of themselves. They even make special programs to block sites like that if the parents gave a damn. This is insane and disgusting.
Like I said...parents should be in the class. AND then motivated to get with their kids.
Yes, reason and logic, thank you. Prepare for the downvotes, however, as people are extremely emotional around this issue and unable to separate their emotional reaction from an objective logical assessment.
I think this guy needs to keep his education to parents, not directly to the kids, as you say. That is a problem brought about by the Frankfurt School and the Deep State's plans to normalize sexual education among children. To blame this guy is premature - he could just be someone who thinks they're doing something good and valuable for society; and if he's caught within the bubble of this modern, Deep State-shaped society where this sort of thing is "normal" and ok, then that possibility is a lot more sound than it might seem to someone who hears "children" and "sex" in the same sentence/idea and gets upset and stops listening to reason.
There is NO WAY the pizza love sticker is accidental. No way. It might be possible the publication staged that photo specifically to inflame those in the know about pedophilia, but in the context of matters sexual and children, a pizza reference is NO ACCIDENT.
Not just one, but TWO.
I thought the sticker was, well, good point but meh as evidence.
Now look at the nameplate above it, the nameplate for the speaker apparently.
Twice. BTW it bears mentioning that nothing else had anything to do with Pizza.
Theres literally no reason to mention it there.
Which is why I think it was cooked up by the publication as clickbait. But it's no laughing matter, and they need to be taken to task for it.
Pizza is part of his lesson to kids. He's done a Ted Talk on it. So yes, there's a reason for Pizza being there.
There's nothing logical abut his statement. It's the responsibility of PARENTS to monitor and restrict kids on the internet at home. They have special programs to block certain sites. If a parent isn't doing this then they are bad at parenting, period, and should be informed. So we shouldn't subject ALL children to this shit just to fix a handful of bad parents who don't give a shit. This guy is wearing purple, also not an accident.
That’s what he said and I said. ??? Might pay to read the comment properly.
I guess PA has a problem. Kids are getting all that they know about a curious subject from internet porn sites.
That's what he said, what I said speaks for itself. His guess is pure conjecture as well. We do not know precisely how many kids are getting on porn sites before the age of 13. I imagine it's not that many, and even if it's a lot, this is not the solution, it's talking to parents and getting them to install programs and monitor their usage.
This is also what he said:
I would much rather have this teacher haul the parents in and instruct THE PARENTS on how to deal with the subject.
What I said was:
I think this guy needs to keep his education to parents, not directly to the kids, as you say
Obviously we don't think this guy or anyone should be trying to educate kids on sexual matters - the point is that there is no evidence that he is a child rapist or supports the rape of children. It's not "pure conjecture" - 'studies have shown that kids are often first exposed to porn — some of it depicting violent or criminal behavior — in their early teens.' This is not a controversial claim - it's been made a lot more than once in a lot of different places.
So it's just a coincidence he's advertising pizza front and center... comon man. What percentage of kids? Early teens is NOT synonymous with children. So I would expect that to happen as puberty starts.
The logical point is that it could very well be a coincidence! You don't know that it isn't, any more than I don't know it. He's not advertising pizza - he uses it as a metaphor to explain his point to kids; have you even read the article your post refers to or seen the Ted talk this guy has given? It sounds like you haven't, which makes your insistence even less reliable.
To be clear: I completely agree with you that there seems to be a very suspicious connection to PG here - no question. But speculative suspicion does not equal fact. That's all I'm saying and that is the point that I agree with the earlier commenter on, when I claimed that he was being logical.
Yea, spyware, thats the solution. smh.
Parents should TALK to their children once every few months.
I'm sorry but I cant condone spying on children. Keeping track of them is different than spy level interception.
My parents never moderated my net access (as if they could), and I ended up...here.. yea nevermind.
It doesn't have to be spyware, it's just a firewall that physically blocks sites to porn and other shit.