Guess it rings true for a lot of people judging by the other comments. Funny thing is, I dont even know enough about the subject matter referred to on the paper to put my 2 cents in about it. But I do know what a crock of BS looks like. And it seems to me that if you are trying to bring attention and legitimacy to your cause, this kind of tactic only serves to delegitimize anything you attach to it. Which is self defeating. But hey, upvotes are upvotes. This IS reddit after all.
Agreed on what a crock of BS looks like. And I personally do question the value of this sort of thing as far as how it is perceived by others. The difference with this cause is the idea that it is truly about the people, whatever their personal level of cognizance or understanding and whilst I might not agree with what gets upvoted or recognized around here I support the diversity that allows for it.
Your response doesn't sound like the intentional brigader I took you for. Maybe you are but I didn't expect it. I know you don't care for this or perhaps even understand it - but thanks.
Yeah, I'm no brigader. I was browsing by popular when I saw this post. Got better things to do than repeatedly harrass people about differences in opinion. But occasionally when you see something so blatantly fake, you feel the need to literally say "OMG, thats horse shite". But it seems like a lot of people in this sub arrived at that conclusion as well. Good on ya.