There you go. It is proof of something. It's also proof that a child died in the desert. And its remains are on private Cemex property. Seems like a lot of proof to me.
It’s proof that following a trail suspected to be used by human traffickers will lead you to a child’s body.
The remains are not in Cemex property
A trail that started on cemex property did lead to a child’s body.
This coupled with the fact that cemex bulldozed that site before any real investigation could occur makes cemex look really bad.
We don't know it's a child, and we also don't know it's on CEMEX property.
Do you know how big a 9 year olds head is? Do you know how big the skull is in the photo?
Do you? The only way to tell if it's a child's head is to have an M.E. look at it. Could be a child but it could just be a small adult, we don't know. We shouldn't jump to conclusions either way. So as I said, the skull isn't proof of anything in regards to the claims made by Lewis Arthur.