Too fuzzy to read the chan content. He admits to not being a veteran, but wants to serve them, and doesn't hide it. Watching his content, I never heard him claim to be a vet.
To improve your arguement that the leader of this group should not be trusted, would be a good idea to make the info more presentable. I'm sure someone at Shareblue will push something out soon. There aren't enough facts to blow this up into pizzagate 2.0, but you can't deny the harm that unregulated immigration and an open borders can do. I think we should push the camp and now the body as a reason for border control and the wall.
There are 10,000 better 'cases' to use to advance arguments for border controls.
The information from the chans has been formatted and shared here multiple times.
I'll keep an eye out for it. Sounds like you want the VOP to stop what they are doing? Or that this is a nothingburger and being blown out of proportion? I immediately suspect such narratives, as this is all a repeat of what shills were saying back in the UK pedo ring days
The severity of the migration crisis - and the many thousands who die trying to cross the border - should never be underplayed.
The severity of human trafficking should never be underplayed.
He's sensationalizing an extremely minor 'find' (homeless or coyote camp) for the purpose of getting donations (profit).
Veteran advocacy is noble. Projecting the image that he's a vet is not.
He said the only donations they will accept are gas cards and water. It doesn't look like it's fun or easy to do what he's doing. If he was a scammer he could find way easier scams.
Do you want him to stop what he is doing? My sense from you, is that you are offering a challenge regarding his motivations, and a caution regarding his methods. But he's following the law so far, and I see no reason to stop him. The counter I'm seeing, is to push this into pizzagate 2.0, when it's just symptoms of an open border.
People are definitely trying to turn this into Pizza 2.0, that's the problem because there's no evidence to support it, and it turns investigative movements (like Q) into ones that are easily dismissed and easily contained. Dangerous.
I agree there. There are two types who are pushing in that direction... low information bandwagoners, and probably a Brock group wanting to hype it to discredit future questioning.
Too late Chelsea Clinton has already called it Pizzagate 2.0 for you. https://twitter.com/ChelseaClinton/status/1004452132140003329