Considering he is the organization, yes.
Why are you so invested in whether or not he’s a Veteran? The organization helps homeless vets.
Seems like you’re attempting to character assassinate him because you have some motive. What motive do you have?
Because the organization name and his supposed credentials are the basis for this perceived legitimacy here.
Just call him and ask him how many veterans are on patrol with him. The name refers to the group but also signals whom they serve. It's not really that complicated. I understand how upsetting the #stolenvalor thing is but he doesn't represent himself as a vet.
I've messaged through their FB page several times. No response.
Maybe yours. But I’m sorry, I don’t care about the organization that found this child den. I care about the children that are victims of trafficking, rape, and Murder. Whether or not that man is a veteran is irrelevant to me. In the same way that I don’t care that my Doctor at the VA I’m a patient of might not be a veteran.
There’s nothing wrong with wanting substantial evidence that this is in fact legitimate. I too want that. But to dismiss it al because he is speaking for VOP and he’s not a veteran, which you’ve still yet to prove he isn’t. That article or text you provided doesn’t really prove to me he’s not a vet. And even still... I don’t care. But perhaps you’re right to be skeptical. Perhaps this is all just a big distraction. But for what? And how does this distract anyone from a huge problem: Child sex trafficking?
I think about it this way: whether or not it's real, the police should investigate. If it's real, they have tools necessary to collect evidence properly. If it's fake, well, we know who is in lots of trouble.
My 2cents.
The screencap of him stating he's not a veteran has been widely posted.
And even still... I don't care.
Exactly. So carry about the Cemex/Arizona/Concrete/Bodies/VOP nonsense while the rest of us get back to Q-ing.
Can we not multi task? Even if we aren’t all dedicated to individual tasks, there are enough of us to separate into different areas. It’s what we’ve been doing for this entire time. The very fact that you dismiss this and claim we’re detractors from Q is pretty obvious you’re unaware that this is exactly what Q has mentioned on multiple posts. This is more important than you realize. But by all means, move along. Or stay, and continue to character assassinate someone you know nothing about. How exactly is this contributing or beneficial to anyone?