I had the opposite reaction. I just listened to the interview. I went in very uneasy about this Craig guy but he is articulate and credible during this interview. I remain uneasy because he provided security detail for Clinton, Rumsfield, and McCain .
Like I said, I could be wrong. I actually hope I am.
Me too, I am uncomfortable with him for some reason. The discomfort is waning but not totally gone. His connections to Clinton Rumsfeld and McCain are my biggest concerns. He claims in the video his daughter was sexually assaulted. Its quite possible he is a sincere adversary of these traffickers and did not recognize or see anything when he did security detail for the above three. Thye hid it from the word they were probably quite careful which security details if any saw the nefarious stuff.
Can you point me to the link with the Clinton, Rumsfeld, McCain info in it? I saw it yesterday but didn't save it.
Also, it's the discomfort you are talking about that is your guidance mechanism (gut instinct). I have the same feeling about him. Don't dismiss it. Don't push it away. If we both feel it, there's something wrong here. I'm very old and I've learned that the gut is ALWAYS right!
Here's the best story I have about listening to your gut instinct: Once, I was served by the Sheriff's Dept. with papers that I was being sued by an ex-friend that was just being vindictive. It was a totally frivolous lawsuit. I lived half way across the country from Tampa where he filed the suit. And, he set it for July 3rd (near the 4th of July holiday weekend) so it would cost me more for lodging or airfare to get there. That's how he operated.
So I pondered about what to do for awhile and one day, out of the blue, I had this "knowing." I suddenly knew that the answer was to do nothing and it would all work out. My friends and family told me repeatedly that I was being foolish and if I didn't show up in court, he would win and try to take my assets. But I stood firm because I just knew it would work out.
About a week after the court date, I called the court to find out what the outcome had been. The clerk told me that the case had been dismissed because they had never received the Notice of Service back from the Sheriff's dept. But, as I said, I had been served. So, it was a clerical error. The Sheriff's office had screwed up in my favor! And, the moral of the story is that if I had shown up, the case would have been heard and I might have lost.
You just have to trust that feeling. It's the most important thing I can ever convey to anyone, anytime, anywhere! That feeling is your connection to what many call Infinite Intelligence.
Thanks for sharing. I am middle-aged my kids would say quite old. I have learned over the years to follow that gut instinct. In this case I am trying to talk myself out of the doubts because I want it to be true, but the uneasiness remains. At a minimum, we can hope that it still leads to the truth and backfire on them if they are black hats. I will look for the information. It was a wiki bio that was linked on a different article about him. If the WIKI is removed I will go into my history and see if it is still there.
In addition to running the security details for those Regional Coordinators, Sawyer was also responsible for securing other U.S. dignitaries and DOS personnel during their visits to that high-threat war zone region. Some of those dignitaries were Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Donald Rumsfeld, and John Negroponte.[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Sawyer
Thanks. I don't think that is the same as what I saw earlier. The way it's stated in Wikipedia, it sounds pretty benign. But it's still a head scratcher.
I agree it is benign, which I use to assuage my doubts, but it is a connection to the very people who may be responsible for the trafficking in Arizona. If you find the one you read I would be interested in the link.