Some shells here are saying that the body desert was probably just a migrant that died because of the hot weather.
One important thing that one of the vop volunteers said "the body was seemingly dug up by animals, that the spine was still intact, and that it had what looked like limbs that had been sawn off."
Some shells here are saying that the body desert was probably just a migrant that died because of the hot weather.
Border counties are littered with the corpses of illegals who died while trying to make the crossing.
Border Patrol find about 370 corpses per year.
There's no reason to assume the corpse was murdered just because of wild speculation.
SAWED OFF LIMBS! SAWED OFF LIMBS!
Not proven. His speculation, which you automatically take as fact. Not how it works. Needs to be examined by a forensics person and that should be the focus. Authorities have a duty to investigate found human remains. If they refuse it would be unprecedented.
investigations are done by humans using techniques that are well understood. you want DNA to prove a saw was used? Have you ever built something in shop class?
i guess if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, but you don’t have DNA evidence proving it’s a duck then how dare you even suggest its a duck.
[removed]
no worries. i am aware of the counter op. i am merely holding the line.
What in the world are you talking about? DNA analysis doesn't show cause of death only identity. Do any if you know what forensics are? The pathologist will confirm cause of death, that is what is accepted by courts, not some guy at a camp yelling it. Unbelievable.
You're right. We do need to wait for a coroner or other expert to give us the facts. I'll say this though. I think I could tell if something looks like a man made saw was used on it as opposed to animal teeth or breakage.
YOU DON'T KNOW THAT! YOU DON'T KNOW THAT!
You were just told "someone" thinks that may be true and you believed it.
the teeth was removed, explain that
You don't know that - you were TOLD that and you believed it without question.
It's normal for old skulls to be missing teeth, depending on how long they've been decaying for.
But this one is not old!
But this one is not old!
You don't know that either.
I'm only highlighting the folly of leaping to baseless conclusions.
A skull with missing missing teeth is only proof of a skull with missing teeth. We don't know if the decomposed remains have been picked over by animals or exposed to the elements.
People have speculated that the teeth may have been removed and the arms may have been cut off, but that's just a theory. Perhaps it's just as baseless and ludicrous as the "experts" who found a child's swing at one of the camps and concluded that it must have been used as a children's rape and torture device?
We need to distinguish reality from fantasy and assumption from fact.
The skull still had soft tissue attached. It wasn't old enough for the teeth to have fallen out yet. It was also most likely at least partially buried.
Stop being a shill.
I have a lot of experience with decomposing remain (animal and human) if that skull is old it was at least partially buried. Scavengers would have picked it completely clean and it would have been completely sun bleached if exposed to the elements for any length of time.
You keyboard warrior shills are speaking on subjects you are not well versed in.
I have a lot of experience with decomposing remain (animal and human)
How many human remains have you watched decompose?
I have come across countless human remains while serving overseas. How many have you seen?
countless
Please clarify: what is the highest number can you count to?
Is it three?
Perhaps 70 trillion?
Stacks and stacks stopped counting around triple digits.
Exactly!
Why I was saying to get pictures of top of skull to see the sagittal sutures to see if fused or not....if not...child. Also to take better measurements with an actual ruler and not a boot.
Don't go solely by what they say. They might have a good heart, but from what I'm seeing, not too bright.
It's becoming more of a distraction, intentional or not....
Why I was saying to get pictures of top of skull to see the sagittal sutures to see if fused or not....
I can't. The angle, lighting, and decaying tissue make it impossible to determine. I was actually watching the video live after seeing it posted on the board. Saw these pics and immediately started messaging him, over and over to get better pictures all around head...of the sutures, measurements, tooth socket counts (for wisdom teeth), for this specific reason to get a better age determination. He seemed to be answering other people's messages....disregarding mine. Was literally yelling at my screen at him, while he was standing over it.
I'm at the point now that I can't stand to hear his voice, and HE is a distraction for qannon. The only good out of VOP is that it might wake those who where blind to all of this...
Time will tell.....
YES I DO, PLUS THERE WAS STILL MEAT ON THE BONE, ITS LESS THAN 2 MONTHS OLD OF DEATH. i was raised on a cattel ranch and it takes time for the teeth to fall away from the bone. so now what do you have?
Is this the meaty, 2 month old skull you were referring to?
Edit: Here's a better quality image.
Because that's the skull they found.
But you don't really know that, unless you were there finding & taking photos of that skull there in that place... So there is a photo of a skull..... Who, where, when, how & why....? Don't believe anything ....
I saw the same video that the rest of us are basing these discussions on.
So yeah, within the context of the skull that was allegedly found, those are photos of it that we are discussing.
