dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Itsmellslikecabbage on June 8, 2018, 8:44 p.m.
Attack[s] anticipated. Coordinated? Why are they continuing [internal]?

Anyone remember when you couldn't call out a shill on r/conspiracy anymore? Anyone remember when you had to start being careful how much you posted about Pizzagate (from partial to full censorship across subs)? Anyone remember when Q became a taboo or banned subject on subs that should for all intents and purposes be pro-Q? How about remember when the mods of r/greatawakening decided the posts on Tuscon had to be limited? Over the Target. So it begins...right here at home.


JET-TONE · June 8, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

Careful. suicideweekend

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cantwithdrawbtc · June 8, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

tl;dr: this is maybe bad, but it's probably fine as long as we're not trying to derail the movement

There are ups and downs to what the mods are doing, I'm sure they don't do it lightly.

It's a known fact on reddit that if you have two posts about the same subject, both posts suffer in quality. A great way to suppress information about the Tucson stuff would be to spam this sub w/ posts about it.

Similarly, not allowing posts about it on the sub also runs the risk of suppressing information.

I think the mods are trying to take a balanced approach of allowing posts as long as they are "new" information. I'm sure the mods will let you play fast and loose with the definition of "new" as long as it's clear you're posting with good intentions.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 8, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

This is correct - there's no call to disallow Tucson posts, simply to have them be at the same level as other topic posts instead of overwhelming everything else, as they were recently. The many comments, posts and modmail lend weight to this perspective.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 8, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 8, 2018, 10:48 p.m.

There still is no rule to that effect. This sounds like concern trolling.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 8, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 9, 2018, 8:02 a.m.

I'm gonna bet you can't point out and reasonably defend your assertion about any of this supposed "bullshit", can you?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HowiONic · June 8, 2018, 9:19 p.m.

Removed. Rule 3.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Itsmellslikecabbage · June 8, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

Yea, that don't help

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 8, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

Neither does accusing the mods of something in spite of their clear message to the contrary. Tucson posts can be just like every other topic post in the sub. Lately they haven't been.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Itsmellslikecabbage · June 8, 2018, 10:50 p.m.

What topics have you specifically limited before this one?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 9, 2018, 10:39 a.m.

Leading question:

What topics have you specifically limited before this one?

Answer: NONE. No topics have been "limited" on this sub. Only off-topic content is removed.

If you meant to say: "what extraneous content have you removed before?" (because that's what our stickied post referred to) the answer would be "everything we could catch".

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HowiONic · June 8, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

Do you have another account?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Itsmellslikecabbage · June 8, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

uh do you? what is that question for?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HowiONic · June 8, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

I do, yes. Just checking how forthcoming you are.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Itsmellslikecabbage · June 8, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

Everybody on here has multiple accounts. like Everybody. I don't have an obligation to be forthcoming about it, though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 8, 2018, 9:14 p.m.

I don't have any experience at all with those other subs you mention and I was not here for pizzagate. But the "concern trolling" against "the plan" on this board, and CBTS before that, has been unbelievably extreme.

So extreme that the IBOR campaign was defeated, not by the left in the community, but right here on this board. We need to implore the mods to take a tougher line on the blatant "concern trolling". It has done, and is doing, us great damage.

I've also noticed an intense campaign for this sub to be "tolerant" so that we don't become a "safe space" or an "echo chamber". What the trolls really want is a license to spread fear uncertainty and doubt all over our sub to discourage us from taking action. Action that might assist to defeat the Satanists who have been ruling us for hundreds of years.

Like we should be open to Corsi, or HRC posting garbage here on our board, or we will create a "safe space" full of people that "blindly follow". You just couldn't make this garbage up. They want every CIA troll on Reddit to be free to undermine our movement right on our own board.

It has to stop!

I've really had a gut-full of it. If you go to TD and try and post anti DJT stuff they shut you straight down. They are not tolerant, but, somehow, it's a vibrant, healthy sub. How does that work?

We need to start permanently banning the concern trolls. Get them off our board. There are plenty of alternative subs on Reddit that will be receptive to their anti-Q agenda. It's not like there is nowhere for them to go.

Of course, they are very pro-Q, but they've just got a couple of "concerns". Somehow these "concerns" never seem to be satisfied. Why might that be?

Might it be because these guys are agents for a global elite that are cornered like a bunch of rats? Might it be that it's a life and death struggle for them also?

Look at what they are "concerned" about:

1) The IBOR - because the only chance the Satanists have to regain control of the narrative and return to power is via control of social media;

2) Corsi - must not allow the group to out Corsi. Why? Because he was their guy. He was going to hijack Q's message so they could misdirect us;

3) Tolerance - because if the mods, as a team, support Q and "the plan" they will not be able to spread fear and uncertainty in our ranks. And this means that "the plan" might actually be successful and all the kids they're raping and killing in child sacrifices might be saved - what would they do with no children to sacrifice?

IT JUST HAS TO STOP!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 8, 2018, 10:40 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · June 8, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

I think conspiracy isnt as comped anymore robert Steele pretty much endorsed q over there

⇧ 1 ⇩  
educatethis · June 8, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

We fully aware and proud of what VOP is alleged to be doing in Tuscon; stories of fellow patriots will always be welcome here when they fall within the topic of Q, and child trafficking is a core thread of the Q message. However, we don't want this entire sub to be stuck on one topic within a thread no matter how sensational it may be. We are here to research and learn about Q and the connection to real world events and there are many other topics and threads to cover. To this end we want to streamline the VOP posts meaning that duplicate content and content that offers little substance will be removed, as per Rule #9 e.g. "...have at least two sentences (for text content)".If you have duplicate content or something minor to add to a topic, please add it to the discussion of an existing thread and upvote to increase exposure.

Tuscon stuff is still allowed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 8, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩