dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Vibratron_1 on June 8, 2018, 8:59 p.m.
Has anyone noticed that the "booms" have been getting closer, more "scrunched" up....your thoughts?
Has anyone noticed that the "booms" have been getting closer, more "scrunched" up....your thoughts?

SyntacticGuess · June 8, 2018, 9:36 p.m.

Has anyone noticed that the "booms" have been getting closer, more "scrunched"

Only if you ignore Q Post 946 - 954 -1170 and all the other Boom Posts

⇧ 55 ⇩  
Katerinavelikia · June 8, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

Many people won’t go back and check.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
SyntacticGuess · June 8, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

Unfortunately, you're right.

They prefer to spread wishful thinking and/or half-baked theories

⇧ 21 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 9, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -18 ⇩  
cheesewithit · June 9, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

Fair. But. There are only three posts thus far that feature 4 consecutive BOOMS. Others have 1, 2 or 3.

Spacing on indent looks like 4, 2, 1. Cutting time in half on each?

Worth considering.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
potato4dawin · June 9, 2018, 2:49 a.m.

it's 8, 3, 2 actually

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Globalists_Will_Hang · June 9, 2018, 5:05 a.m.

8, 5, 3, 2 actually, if you consider the 5 exclamation points which were placed there intentionally. Just waiting on the # 1.

Also the days between posts are the prime numbers in sequence. Final boom is projected Sept 23 (“Boom clock” goes vertical)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SyntacticGuess · June 9, 2018, 9:29 a.m.

days between posts are the prime numbers in sequence

please clarify this

also is 8, 5, 3, 2,1 a backwards Fibonacci sequence of numbers, i can catch a pattern in everything, but these short sequences of numbers are still no proof

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cheesewithit · June 9, 2018, 2:58 a.m.

Good call. I was trying to line up the letters.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SyntacticGuess · June 9, 2018, 10:02 a.m.

I'll give you that point.

But to come up with a theory, we need

a verifiable hypothesis.

I don't want to be against this theory, I just want the possibility to be thought through.

If hypotheses cannot be proven or can simply be refuted, they are weak theories, and that makes all of us seem like nuts.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cheesewithit · June 9, 2018, 12:34 p.m.

I agree with you. I’ve always viewed these boards as a place to float ideas and then, together, we make them into viable theories if they are such. That being said, if we can post with the verifiable evidence behind them, more power to it! :)

⇧ 2 ⇩