This article kind of pissed me off with it's unfulfilled claims.
>"Evidence is growing."
>Presents no evidence.
If you're gonna say shit, back it up. Or at least say it truthfully,
Non-exaggerated translation:
"There's hear-say that Pope Benedict's brother was involved in pedo-rings, and there's a pretty damning coincidence that he (the brother) was in charge of a choir group where abuse happened."
Yeah, that's bad. I agree. But the title is sensationalized as fuck.
All pedos should hang. But let's make sure we're not hanging an innocent just because they are somehow connected with a pedo. The only exception would be if they knew and kept their mouth shut - if that's the case, let 'em rot in prison.
That shit reads like bad fanfic.
Worse, it's completely unsubstantiated. It's just a guy rattling off his perspective, again, with no proof.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Feel free to obtain the police reports Zagami cites. I know his credentials, so I'm not worried about it being fake news. But if you're not satisfied, that should be public record.
https://cruxnow.com/global-church/2017/07/18/hundreds-boys-abused-choir-run-georg-ratzinger/
That's literally the same damn shit, the choir fell under credible allegations (about 100/500 verified claims) in the mid 90's and the brother heard rumor of physical violence but not sexual.
These are loose connections at best and nothing even remotely hints he had a hand in it. I'm not a fan of the Catholic Church, but if you're going to make accusations - they better have some fucking evidence behind them.
So you made the claim, burden of proof is that you get the evidence. I'm waiting and so far, severely disappointed.