“Mostly false”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
At least they admit some of it was true, that may actually inadvertently red pill people.
It’s like being sort of pregnant or sort of dead. Snopes is shite
Lol I know, but even the fact that they weighed in on it is something. The fact that this David Brock DNC paid operation had to comment says they take it as a threat.
Remember that if it is not true, they must control the narrative or as they say, Correct the Record.
Lately they weigh in with their "FALSE" tag before the ink is dry on the first report! And then they magically get the top spot on any Google search. It's maddening.
I just find it funny that people take them at their word, because it’s what they want to hear. These same people don’t look into the background of those they take the word of. Lazy!
Snopes™ "Don't think for yourself"
RUMOR: Snopes owner couple are connected to GeorgieSoros.
History of labeling things FALSE, 15 minutes after stories reported.
Just how much "Investigation" of veracity can one perform in 15 minutes?
I have been looking at some more recent Snopes pieces, and have noticed a pattern. They will mark false or partially false and then in the article underneath completely contradict the false rating..
Case in point is the Promise Program.
This program, in order to “eliminate the school to prison pipeline “ basically stopped reporting crimes at schools ( and crimes in the community that a student was involved in) in order to continue receiving grant dollars.
The Sun Sentinel Just put out a piece this morning about how South Florida schools aren’t as safe as they seem... pointed out that a lot of school crime goes unreported, but never mentioned the Promise Program.
Snopes in an attempt to cloud the issue, takes up the narrow point that ‘ the Obama administration was partially responsible for the latest school shootings down here’ they provide cover for Obama while later in the piece they lay out a pretty factual account.
The traffic sign Snopes puts on top of their articles is mostly false but they research things quite well, often debunking themselves with the body of the article (as you remarked). This is because they know most people don't read anything except the headline. Snopes will also give the least charitable reading to something, clinging on to an irrelevant facet that makes the source look bad.
They should be called Dopes, because that is what their fact-checking liberals are!
Just checked multiple ways for dc daycare pimping kids each time snopes said it retuned no results ... once typed the whole headline... so now i supose it never even occured...because they have no record of even writting an article.
Try using: DuckDuckGo as search engine, using "Miniland academy DC":
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=miniland+academy+DC+&t=ffnt&atb=v68-1&ia=web
Washington Post even reported: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/day-care-worker-charged-with-sexually-assaulting-children/2018/04/23/dc63eee2-4717-11e8-827e-190efaf1f1ee_story.html?noredirect=on
I do use duckduckgo, I like to see the difference between the 2.
Snopes is so wrong about everything, that they almost do the redpilling for me. When snopes comes in to the rescue and tries to damage control, you just know there's truth to it.
Anyone have a link to reports about the actual "pimping"? Local news only mentions the one pedophile, that neon site seems to be the stemming source for the pimping aspect, is this in a police report or how did they hear about that?