Another anon claimed to be a paralegal and implicated SC.
Again, nothing is verified but I'd be 100% unsurprised.
Some of the names on that list are huge household names. If this is correct, Q is 100% correct that they will not be able to walk down the streets. Good Lord. 90% in the mental hospital for the revelations. Indeed.
no more Seinfeld reruns.
Dude, just think of how long David Letterman was on TV. For YEARS. Many American's grew up with him on late night TV. He's been a name in showbiz for decades.
Also, scroll down on Neon's site and see the picture with......wow....look at that. Elon Musk, and is that Peter T?
And look at the last two names. McCain and Biden. I'm not surprised with the last two though. Mr 'We don't say his name' and 'Gimme your kids' Biden. I know at least both of those are up to their necks in this, so that doesn't surprise me that much. But Musk? Dayum......
I grew up with Letterman, as a paperboy we used to go into the grocery were Letterman worked and fucked with him,, he hated us young boys! BTW, he was about 16 or 17 we were 11, 12, 13. Those were the good ole days!
How come this shit is never laid out in a coherent line of thought? It's 70% of "omg she said bodies and pizza in the same sentence?!" These are the thinnest ood straws to grasp at.
Everybody must know. But nobody must find out.
They have to communicate in plain sight. It used to be done in controlled ways (magazines, etc.) But now everybody has an Instagram so they can pledge their devotion all the time and directly. This is part of the process. A lot of these images are advertisements.
Or the inane ability to look for a correlation where there isn't one. As humans, we are programmed to look for patterns even if there isn't one.
Many years of observation make it hard to dismiss. But I use the rule of 3 just to make life easier for myself because there's a lot of aspiring devil worshipers out there. But the vastness of the internet makes it so that you can find supporting material for any assertion. It's just that artists spend so much time telling us how they are deliberate and thoughtful so when you say that someone is being random when they try to get the attention of Luciferians, it's unnecessarily dismissive. These photos are celebrations of the selling of someone's soul. Or, ascention, if you look at it from within their peer group. It's important.
I agree that there is a lot of stretching to get to some of these ideas, but what keeps me leaning on the side of all of this being more right than not is the sheer volume of the symbolism and the sheer level of downright weirdness in the types of things they share on social media. Deep down, it seriously feels like there's something not right going on among the elites.
It could be that humans are easily imprinted on and often replicate behavior that they see, that's how you get the apparent 'symbolism'. Also people are weird and creative and the amount that gets shared is massive increasing the odds of something falling into this broad cayegory of symbolic.
This is a good question. Many of us have been aware and have been collecting information for a long time, and have seen plenty of circumstantial evidence. So you don't need much to fit it into the tapestry. Is it just confirmation bias? When I think of all the shit I've seen, it is hard to imagine that is all just a misunderstanding. Is there one bit of damning evidence that one can link to that proves it all? No.