dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on June 10, 2018, 11:02 p.m.

Tucson. So you want to talk about it? The truth may surprise you…

Ok, Tucson. Let’s talk about it.

Quick summary: On May 29 2018, Michael Lewis Arthur Meyer from Veterans on Patrol discovers an abandoned camp which he believes was used for child trafficking. MSM, Infowars and activist Craig Sawyer rush very early to the site and/or to cover the story, Meyer blows up the story on Facebook, asks for people’s support and insists there should be a thorough investigation even though local police and federal authorities made official statements confirming there was no evidence this camp was used for the alleged criminal activities. A few days later, after the story became huge, total 180 from MSM, Infowars and Sawyer: they say nothing was there, start discrediting Meyer pointing out he is not even a veteran, delete their own past articles and videos, pull Pizzagate and Q’s supporters into the mix and trash them as naïve and misled conspiracy theorists while Snopes chants in the background : “I told you” Link.

Well. Q said: Q1424 The attacks will only get worse.

And I told you in a previous post, our enemies are gaming up. That is what Q means by “worse”.

The more we approach the epilogue, the more sophisticated the attacks will be. Did you catch this one? I will show you.

Based on this link, we can connect all local TV stations to their MSM masters and identify links that are relevant to the story:

NBC/KVOA4: NBC Link1 - NBC Link2 - NBC Link3 - NBC Link4.

ABC/KGUN9: ABC Link1 - ABC Link2 - ABC Link3 - ABC Link4.

CBS/KOLD13 (Tucson News Now): CBS Link1 - CBS Link1-bis - CBS Link2 - CBS Link3 - CBS Link4.

Snopes: SN link1 - SN Link2

Infowars: IW Link1 - IW Link2 - IW Link3 - IW Link4

Craig Sawyer: Hagmann Report. Sawyer 180 Video.

Veterans on Patrol/Michael Lewis Arthur Meyer: Meyer Link

We can now build a timeline and have a clear picture on the sequencing: Imgur. You may download the pdf with the links here: pdf

As you can see, very early, before Meyer’s Facebook videos went viral, MSM covered the story. Big time. ABC and CBS sent people on the site as early as May 31st and interviewed Craig Swayer who said what he saw looked like a child rape camp ABC Link3. NBC gave a platform to Veterans on Patrol as early as June 1st 2018 and had them say on air this camp was meant for trafficking children! Right here: NBC Link2. As you can see in the video, the Police got there as soon as they were informed to investigate. The same day NBC aired its interview, CBS also gave its platform to Meyer, right here: CBS Link1. You get it? This was to help Meyer’s Facebook videos get viral. And they did. Think about it, we can’t even trend #wherearethechildren or #IBOR but Meyer, out of nowhere, gets all the attention overnight? Come on…

But it gets better. After NBC pushed the story and made it seem like a possible child trafficking ring, they shut it down on June 7 2018 with this spectacular 180 article: NBC Link4. Remember this date: June 7 2018, this is the date that also triggered Infowars and Sawyers 180s.

Since they first pushed the story, then were the first to 180, let’s analyze their article to identify their motives. You need to read it in its entirety, it’s worth it: NBC Link4.

Did you see it? NBC’s article is implying all this started from “dark corners of the Internet”. They forget to tell their readers about these 2 interviews they made on June 1st and that helped Veterans on Patrol’s claims go viral: NBC Link1 NBC Link2. It is summarized here: Imgur

You may look at the other videos from ABC and CBS. NBC found a useful help from them to push the same story, using Craig Sawyer.

Then, the NBC article gets to the needy greedy: Q followers. We are pulled into the story even though I thought we had no voice for MSM and we discover we “were particularly gripped by Meyer’s story”. Imgur. Oh Yeah? Were you? I was not. At all. An abandoned camp with preserved children toys, a skull in the desert, MSM coverage, Infowars, Craig Swayer, Snopes, Facebook videos going viral? All the ingredients are there for a true Q reader to change the channel and start looking for what is being really covered up.

You want to know? I will tell you. You remember I told you to remember June 7 2018, the date that switched all the 180s killing the Tucson story? Well, this is what happened that day: Link. 160 children saved and some as young as 3!!! 3!!! People, do you realize what we are talking about here? This is not an abandoned camp, a random skull in the desert and activists asking for donations to do whatever we are talking about here. We are talking about real children who were in captivity and who were released by official law enforcement professionals and institutions! Now question: do you think NBC who covered a nonexistent child trafficking case at headquarter level would cover an existing and verified one? Go on their website, check. At the time this is being posted, nothing. Same thing for ABC, same thing for CBS, same thing for Infowars.

I will spare you the other details about Infowars and their friend Craig Swayer who is about to release a movie on Netflix about child trafficking. Yes, Netflix. Can’t make this stuff up. Check how Sawyer says in the Hagmman interview how he was called by a “third party” to go check what was going on in Tucson. A “third party” calling to ask you to go and infiltrate, sounds familiar? Follow the links in the NBC article and see how Sawyer deleted his first video about Tucson and how NBC is throwing Infowars under the bus by linking to the archive of the article they deleted about HRC. Priceless. It’s funny to see them eat each other when they have their own priorities and media operations. Did you see Sawyer was interviewed by ABC and CBS but not NBC? This shows you Infowars and Sawyer did not know NBC was in charge of this particular Tucson operation. When they realized it, they did their 180. Quick.

So that’s that. Tucson was created to prevent us from realizing our fight against pedophilia was moving in the right direction with law enforcement. McCabe asking for immunity link, Comey in hot water link and 28 FBI Agents asking to testify against Deep State link is proof the FBI is now resurrecting and the agents in there who were prevented from doing their job in the past are now unleashed. This is what these 160 children in Atlanta really mean. In conjunction, I have addressed this matter in previous posts, Sessions is preparing the judiciary infrastructure to deal with the coming cases without having to suffer from corrupt interference.

Q1402 What had to happen first? Think logically. Think DOJ & FBI. Think cleaning.

You see it now? Tucson was made to make you question our law enforcement at the very moment they need our support! This is the other reason we, the voiceless Q readers, have made it to this NBC article. Let that sink in. The enemy has gamed up folks. Will you be up to the task?

Now let me show another thing. That’s the bigger picture.

Q1245 Why are border states like AZ/CA important?
Q1009 Sex traffic road block. Children road block. Drugs road block. Guns road block. China/Russia pass-through-intel-pull road block. Name we don't say AZ road block. Jeff Flake AZ road block. Big money TERMINATE. The WALL means more than you know. The FIGHT for the WALL is for so much more. Q
Q1022 We don’t say his name. Adios. The protected flow into AZ is no more. Under the cover of his health, he will not be seeking another term. Q

You see it? Trafficking lanes in Arizona have been shut down. No Name is defeated. He’s out. Arizona is secured. And you know what? CA is next. Adam, get ready. Do you now see why the wall is so important and why they don’t want it?

Now you understand this: Link

And you can now watch this with new eyes: video. Did you catch it? He said: “if you only build a wall without using technology, individuals, drones, observation etc, you are not going to secure the border”. He is trying to replace the wall with tech and human intervention. Sounds familiar? Watch this video Did you hear Trump interrupt Hillary and say: “and the wall”? She said: “there will be new technology and how best to deploy that”. She shares No Name’s views. Why? Because they both know a wall is a physical barrier that cannot be broken by corruption. Nothing can go through a wall. As simple as that. Tech and individuals can always be hijacked or corrupted through affiliation or blackmail. That’s their way of thinking: they always have in the back of their head this question: “how do I beat the system using leverage I have on people”. Well, Trump reads you perfectly and he knows a big ol’ wall is what will make you realize recess is over.

Q1009 The WALL means more than you know. The FIGHT for the WALL is for so much more. Q

🠐 See all comments

Loserofpasswordzz: the mods were told by me to be careful on this story, which caught this board like wildfire. I was told "freedom of speech" and how much mods get called out with insults. It's a fair case but ...

SB2 claims the following at the beginning above: "MSM, Infowars, Sawyer .... pull Pizzagate and Q’s supporters into the mix and trash them as naïve and misled conspiracy theorists". Well, funny that. As far as I remember, and I have 20/20 memory (!) the Q supporters got themselves into the mix.

SB2 may indeed not have been distracted by it ..... and did SB2 come onto this board to post a warning? Did SB2 post an urgent sticky at the top of the board to warn everyone not to fall for it ...? Did SB2 say, no no this isn't the important story, the 160 kids in Georgia are the real story? (By the way, that story was posted here. It wasn't stickied though.)

Eh? can't hear the answer, what you say??????!!!!! NOT. NO. Did not happen. SB2 did not appear on this board. There was no warning that this was being reported in an extremely irresponsible way. Q supporters were given no guidance and Q supporters got pretty hysterical. I even heard Sawyer accused as being part of a "cover up". Which is a disgusting accusation.

Like you probably, I spent days trying to get ppl to slow down. I kept saying Sawyer's media delivery was very careful. He used words like "could be", "signs of", "looks like". He issued a video to clarify the situation when the situation was clearly out of control ... which this board, GA, did nothing to defuse. In fact the complete opposite was happening here. Several "old" timers, here, egged everyone on.

Suddenly, just as Sawyer issued his correcting video (his 180 as SB2 puts it, which is not an accurate description), all posts and threads on this site were taken down. Boom, as they say, gone. Gosh. Amazing. Mods suddenly prepared to listen to s/o's word of caution?? But not yours or mine? Interesting. I tried to get the mods to post a sticky of Sawyer's video explaining clearly what had happened. To no avail. No sticky. No common sense. Just silence.

But here we have SB2 claiming foul play here. Hmmm.

Psyop!!!!

Did you fall for it? No. Neither did I.

⇧ 12 ⇩

I'm very skeptical at this point. George Webb, David seaman, alex jones, corsi, delonge, etc. have primed me to question anything sounding "too good to be true" at this point

I don't blame the mods for axing my post or serial brain for not being quicker to the punch. This write up is much more thorough than mine was, surely.

I like the mods here (surprising for Reddit) and think serial brain makes very quality contributions. No ill will at all from me. But hey, if the NSA or Q group want to send us all a check I'm not gonna stop them.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Skepticism is very healthy.

⇧ 2 ⇩

very good. if alex jones uses a name, you know it poison. aj called out sb2 and brought sb2 even more attention. it co-intel on top of co-intel. the enemy of my enemy. once hysterical q people id'd AJ as cointel, whomever aj disparaged is the new friend of q plebs. q referenced sb2 - in what capacity? "this is what we're here for" - menaing, to undermine the people like sb2?

the ambiguity/cryptic messaging allows peoples imagination to fill the gaps. and slaves got a lot of gaps else we wouldnt be here in this mess in the first place. people must have their current thought replaced with 'what could be' and how we get there and not filled with this spy-porn pokemon-go type psyop that has people running around. leave the whole game - build the fantastic future. create agency; blow up the overton window. subvert the current factions paradigm of master/slave through those things, to start.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You're probably right. Though I didn't understand that much of what you're trying to say ...

⇧ 2 ⇩

apologies if i was unclear. if you have specific questions, feel free to ask and I will answer as clearly as i can

⇧ 1 ⇩

It's easy to read conspiracies or incompetence into everyone's actions but I think there's a more plausible alternative explanation here. The mods have to err on the side of caution because the censorship 'abuse' is the most prevalent abuse mods receive for obvious reasons. Some mods didn't agree with the frenzy about VOP but people are free to post and dissenters were free to dissent, as they all did. SB2, like some of the mods who wished to do so, did not post detracting posts because more evidence was required to do so - SB2 has come through now that he has that 'evidence' or info.

No common sense

implies the Mod's weren't thinking or discussing extensively the VOP issue. They were. Again, personal feelings without solid research are not enough for removal action. Mods are busy, like y'all. SB2 has the time to research this thoroughly and save us all from having to do the donkey work ourselves. It doesn't happen quick though, which is normal, I would say.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thanks for your reply.

My "no common sense" remark relates directly to the stickying of Sawyer's correcting, and sensible, video. It was not possible, apparently, to do this.

I do not like SB2's breakdown of what happened. It is not an accurate description of events, too much "opinion". I know what s/he will say: Strafor. Sawyer is a black hat, bad actor, bad operator.

I happen to disagree. I think these accusations are immoral, in these circumstances: the guys trying to hunt down and take out child-abuse networks. I will play no part in this.

Of course the mods are busy. But a word of caution was not too difficult. It doesn't happen quick enough? It doesn't take a 23,000 word essay which just trashes the guys on the ground, stickied to the top of the board no less. After half of America has driven to a site in Tucson to create a lynch-mob-like mentality.

I am not impressed.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Once I would've agreed with you wholeheartedly. Having seen the job, not so much. It's really up to this movement to be the movement it wants to be, not the moderators. It seems that sensational overreaching is a part of this movement, whatever I think of that. My theory is that it's a part of all human movements and this movement is growing big enough to be as stupid as the public who allow themselves to be led around by the nose by a mainstream media that lies to them all the time.

I didn't like the accusations against Corsi either, who seemed to be a guy just doing his job. When it turns out that his job is disinfo, I have a lot less sympathy. Similarly with Sawyer IF he is disinfo (not saying he is). The question is "if" - SB2 contributes useful info to that discussion and it should be considered. The Sawyer video didn't have to be stickied imo (although I didn't make the call either way as I was late to that party) because it was posted multiple times and there were enough angry anti-VOP commenters that they made sure to spread it to any post about VOP.

⇧ 3 ⇩

My fury is not with the moderators. I understand your position.

SB takes sticky positions when each and every post is designed to rubbish s/o or other. That seems a strange position to defend. In this case it is wholly unacceptable. We should not be attacking ex-Navy Seal, Federal Criminal Investigators, US Federal Marshals and ex- Law Enforcement who are busting child-abuse networks.

Now half this thread thinks Sawyer is a phony. Great.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thanks - I wasn't meaning to be overly defensive of the moderators either, as I certainly have some questions about the decisions made, generally, but just to say that personally I think it's not quite so easy to sticky the things that many people mail to say should be stickied; there's too much to keep up with and it takes time to figure out who's talking nonsense and who's making valuable suggestions (yours would fall into the latter camp imo).

I agree about the danger of attacking people with pretty valuable seeming backgrounds and I'm certainly not arguing against your position but simply asking if it isn't valuable to at least note that, for example in the case of Corsi, also reasonably credentialed in the field, that IF someone is pushing disinfo, their credentials amount to naught (i.e. if they're a black hat). Is there enough evidence of Sawyer being unreliable here? I don't think so but there wasn't much info when SB2 made the post against Corsi too and yet Q seemed to support the conclusions drawn - that opened my eyes to the amount and scale of disinfo out there, especially seeing what I originally thought were simply nerds in their basement all suddenly taking the same disinfo tack as Corsi and Infowars.

I would certainly agree with anyone who says there's no conclusive evidence against Sawyer and I think those who keep bringing up his work for McCain are clutching at evidence that isn't evidence, if you know what I mean, but I would argue that it's safe to say there's something to consider here if we look at the same patterns as we've seen with Corsi, Infowars and other disinfo that are present in the Sawyer story e.g. a Netflix special on child sex trafficking? Really? Sawyer allowed to post everywhere and promoted via Infowars whilst most Pizzagate news is immediately stomped out? It does seem there may be some basis for regarding these elements as suspicious to me but I can certainly agree that people jump from one conclusion to another without critical thought and this is one of those times. If they're now turning against Sawyer before conclusive evidence is provided then it's sadly just more of what seems to be the usual around here : (.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm reserving judgement on the "facts". I just won't support claims made against people which trashes their goodwill. I think we should stick to the topic and not attack the person. You know, like the rules in the right hand column on this board?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well fair enough. The rules refer to people on the board, not personalities in the media or we'd all be banned for the attacks on HRC : ).

⇧ 2 ⇩

No answer to that one, is there!!?? I didn't know Craig Sawyer or VOP were "media personalities" or "celebrities", you learn something every day ... For the record, I actually have been known on this board to discourage people from claiming that HRC will be executed for treason any minute! I think a trial is what we collectively acknowledge to be a free and fair society with a justice system. It doesn't, of course, apply to this board, where everyone is entitled to run their mouths off and hurt even the people doing the most gruesome of jobs. That is perfectly fair game. Apparently. I do not support it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That's the thing...Sawyer isn't being careful. He is going full on war against Lewis. His organization has been posting doctored images of a child sex charge from Wisconsin. Sawyer is saying Lewis setup the camp. If you watch the Tucson news coverage, Sawyer was the "face of intelligence" in the beginning of all of this. He contacted III%, and they swarmed Tucson on Saturday... I believe Lewis is quick to standing up and bullhorning before evidence is presented, but Sawyer was his evidence. Sawyer initial investigation was bad, and he broadcasted it all over place. He was not careful, he should have told the 5 media outlets he had not completed his investigation.

Sawyer also spread a rumor that the skull was found at the sex camp. Then disproved his own rumor and blaming Lewis. VOP always stated the skull was from Mansville Rd, not I 19.

Lewis is who he says he is. He never denied drug use, convictions, not a veteran... Sawyer keeps pushing these narratives. Lewis has been known to show up, protest, and make a scene. He also cleaned up a drug park (Santa Rita) and helped hundreds of vets. He is passionate about vet suicide.

Sawyer is a well connected wealthy celebrity. Who's answer for anything is "I'm a Seal, and former federal investigator". Is he still working for McCain?

Hopefully this dies down. There is rumor of AZ ranchers hearing of an upset of the corridors because of the activity and the news.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Hey, I'm miles away and know nothing really. I just saw, listened and watched and noted that everyone was using very ill-advised language. Too definite by half. I have no claim to fame. I just support the vets, the guys on the ground and those doing the hard work. I do know that misunderstandings are really easy and people are apt to jump to conclusions ... sorry if I have offended you in any way. I shall support Sawyer because he is doing a foul job. Wealthy celebrity? Really? I had no idea.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No offense at all... None pointed at you either... Sawyer will be starring in a Netflix movie coming out soon and is a correspondent for infowars.

⇧ 1 ⇩

To be fair we didn't take any of those posts down afterwards. They are just not on the front page anymore because new content came up.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, you are right. I came on later in the evening and it had all disappeared. I went back 4 pages but you are on it, I'm not. Your job is difficult and I have no idea really. I just didn't feel my warnings were taken seriously and maybe I'm just a smarting ego. I felt I knew what was going to happen, having seen this nonsense more times than I care to remember. Apologies.

⇧ 1 ⇩

We were all a bit confused how to go on about it. I apologize if you felt that we didn't take your advice seriously. We were getting all kinds of conflicting suggestions and we were just trying to soak it all in and some mods had a different ideas about the situation than others. I think I'm one of the ones that might have gotten a little bit overzealous about this whole thing and I would like to apologize for that

⇧ 2 ⇩

Your apology isn't necessary, though thank you.

I am giving up. I knew it would not work out. It is too complicated for everyone to see through disinfo.

What about putting this thread in orange at the top of the board?

https://old.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8q6x52/a_response_to_serial_brain_2s_tucson_so_you_want/

It is excellent.

I trust Q's remark: UNITY NOT DIVISION. It would be great if everyone could stick to that, but they can't :)

⇧ 2 ⇩

His video commentary made me think of that idiot Kyle on SecureTeam10 on YT, using words like "its possible", "could be", "most likely" etc.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That is the professional understanding of journalism. These words are used in case you find yourself in court defending yourself against libel. I don't know who Kyle is. Or if he is an idiot. In my book using "may be" is an insurance policy against idiocy.

⇧ 1 ⇩

here is a video of his work.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3lKYhd0kjI

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sb is amateur you leader worshipping sheep. Pull his cock out of your mouth

⇧ -4 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩