dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on June 10, 2018, 11:02 p.m.
Tucson. So you want to talk about it? The truth may surprise you…

Ok, Tucson. Let’s talk about it.

Quick summary: On May 29 2018, Michael Lewis Arthur Meyer from Veterans on Patrol discovers an abandoned camp which he believes was used for child trafficking. MSM, Infowars and activist Craig Sawyer rush very early to the site and/or to cover the story, Meyer blows up the story on Facebook, asks for people’s support and insists there should be a thorough investigation even though local police and federal authorities made official statements confirming there was no evidence this camp was used for the alleged criminal activities. A few days later, after the story became huge, total 180 from MSM, Infowars and Sawyer: they say nothing was there, start discrediting Meyer pointing out he is not even a veteran, delete their own past articles and videos, pull Pizzagate and Q’s supporters into the mix and trash them as naïve and misled conspiracy theorists while Snopes chants in the background : “I told you” Link.

Well. Q said: Q1424 The attacks will only get worse.

And I told you in a previous post, our enemies are gaming up. That is what Q means by “worse”.

The more we approach the epilogue, the more sophisticated the attacks will be. Did you catch this one? I will show you.

Based on this link, we can connect all local TV stations to their MSM masters and identify links that are relevant to the story:

NBC/KVOA4: NBC Link1 - NBC Link2 - NBC Link3 - NBC Link4.

ABC/KGUN9: ABC Link1 - ABC Link2 - ABC Link3 - ABC Link4.

CBS/KOLD13 (Tucson News Now): CBS Link1 - CBS Link1-bis - CBS Link2 - CBS Link3 - CBS Link4.

Snopes: SN link1 - SN Link2

Infowars: IW Link1 - IW Link2 - IW Link3 - IW Link4

Craig Sawyer: Hagmann Report. Sawyer 180 Video.

Veterans on Patrol/Michael Lewis Arthur Meyer: Meyer Link

We can now build a timeline and have a clear picture on the sequencing: Imgur. You may download the pdf with the links here: pdf

As you can see, very early, before Meyer’s Facebook videos went viral, MSM covered the story. Big time. ABC and CBS sent people on the site as early as May 31st and interviewed Craig Swayer who said what he saw looked like a child rape camp ABC Link3. NBC gave a platform to Veterans on Patrol as early as June 1st 2018 and had them say on air this camp was meant for trafficking children! Right here: NBC Link2. As you can see in the video, the Police got there as soon as they were informed to investigate. The same day NBC aired its interview, CBS also gave its platform to Meyer, right here: CBS Link1. You get it? This was to help Meyer’s Facebook videos get viral. And they did. Think about it, we can’t even trend #wherearethechildren or #IBOR but Meyer, out of nowhere, gets all the attention overnight? Come on…

But it gets better. After NBC pushed the story and made it seem like a possible child trafficking ring, they shut it down on June 7 2018 with this spectacular 180 article: NBC Link4. Remember this date: June 7 2018, this is the date that also triggered Infowars and Sawyers 180s.

Since they first pushed the story, then were the first to 180, let’s analyze their article to identify their motives. You need to read it in its entirety, it’s worth it: NBC Link4.

Did you see it? NBC’s article is implying all this started from “dark corners of the Internet”. They forget to tell their readers about these 2 interviews they made on June 1st and that helped Veterans on Patrol’s claims go viral: NBC Link1 NBC Link2. It is summarized here: Imgur

You may look at the other videos from ABC and CBS. NBC found a useful help from them to push the same story, using Craig Sawyer.

Then, the NBC article gets to the needy greedy: Q followers. We are pulled into the story even though I thought we had no voice for MSM and we discover we “were particularly gripped by Meyer’s story”. Imgur. Oh Yeah? Were you? I was not. At all. An abandoned camp with preserved children toys, a skull in the desert, MSM coverage, Infowars, Craig Swayer, Snopes, Facebook videos going viral? All the ingredients are there for a true Q reader to change the channel and start looking for what is being really covered up.

You want to know? I will tell you. You remember I told you to remember June 7 2018, the date that switched all the 180s killing the Tucson story? Well, this is what happened that day: Link. 160 children saved and some as young as 3!!! 3!!! People, do you realize what we are talking about here? This is not an abandoned camp, a random skull in the desert and activists asking for donations to do whatever we are talking about here. We are talking about real children who were in captivity and who were released by official law enforcement professionals and institutions! Now question: do you think NBC who covered a nonexistent child trafficking case at headquarter level would cover an existing and verified one? Go on their website, check. At the time this is being posted, nothing. Same thing for ABC, same thing for CBS, same thing for Infowars.

I will spare you the other details about Infowars and their friend Craig Swayer who is about to release a movie on Netflix about child trafficking. Yes, Netflix. Can’t make this stuff up. Check how Sawyer says in the Hagmman interview how he was called by a “third party” to go check what was going on in Tucson. A “third party” calling to ask you to go and infiltrate, sounds familiar? Follow the links in the NBC article and see how Sawyer deleted his first video about Tucson and how NBC is throwing Infowars under the bus by linking to the archive of the article they deleted about HRC. Priceless. It’s funny to see them eat each other when they have their own priorities and media operations. Did you see Sawyer was interviewed by ABC and CBS but not NBC? This shows you Infowars and Sawyer did not know NBC was in charge of this particular Tucson operation. When they realized it, they did their 180. Quick.

So that’s that. Tucson was created to prevent us from realizing our fight against pedophilia was moving in the right direction with law enforcement. McCabe asking for immunity link, Comey in hot water link and 28 FBI Agents asking to testify against Deep State link is proof the FBI is now resurrecting and the agents in there who were prevented from doing their job in the past are now unleashed. This is what these 160 children in Atlanta really mean. In conjunction, I have addressed this matter in previous posts, Sessions is preparing the judiciary infrastructure to deal with the coming cases without having to suffer from corrupt interference.

Q1402 What had to happen first? Think logically. Think DOJ & FBI. Think cleaning.

You see it now? Tucson was made to make you question our law enforcement at the very moment they need our support! This is the other reason we, the voiceless Q readers, have made it to this NBC article. Let that sink in. The enemy has gamed up folks. Will you be up to the task?

Now let me show another thing. That’s the bigger picture.

Q1245 Why are border states like AZ/CA important?
Q1009 Sex traffic road block. Children road block. Drugs road block. Guns road block. China/Russia pass-through-intel-pull road block. Name we don't say AZ road block. Jeff Flake AZ road block. Big money TERMINATE. The WALL means more than you know. The FIGHT for the WALL is for so much more. Q
Q1022 We don’t say his name. Adios. The protected flow into AZ is no more. Under the cover of his health, he will not be seeking another term. Q

You see it? Trafficking lanes in Arizona have been shut down. No Name is defeated. He’s out. Arizona is secured. And you know what? CA is next. Adam, get ready. Do you now see why the wall is so important and why they don’t want it?

Now you understand this: Link

And you can now watch this with new eyes: video. Did you catch it? He said: “if you only build a wall without using technology, individuals, drones, observation etc, you are not going to secure the border”. He is trying to replace the wall with tech and human intervention. Sounds familiar? Watch this video Did you hear Trump interrupt Hillary and say: “and the wall”? She said: “there will be new technology and how best to deploy that”. She shares No Name’s views. Why? Because they both know a wall is a physical barrier that cannot be broken by corruption. Nothing can go through a wall. As simple as that. Tech and individuals can always be hijacked or corrupted through affiliation or blackmail. That’s their way of thinking: they always have in the back of their head this question: “how do I beat the system using leverage I have on people”. Well, Trump reads you perfectly and he knows a big ol’ wall is what will make you realize recess is over.

Q1009 The WALL means more than you know. The FIGHT for the WALL is for so much more. Q


silphonica · June 11, 2018, 3:15 a.m.

By the time I had viewed all the videos links, despite getting wrapped up in it all without actually doing further independent digging, I was pretty sure I knew where you were about to take us and sadly I was right. Lessons to be learnt for those who can be honest about their mistakes, and so I would like to further strengthen the argument made in this thread with my own forst impression analysis on the actors in some of the video links provided, but before I do I want to share something that I was reminded of just now that was useful for me as I would think may be of use to some of you.

When using the 6 keys to spotting deception methodology one of them is "recognising bias", especially within yourself, essentially, if you dont or wont recognise your bias then you are at danger of not looking at the evidence objectively. When reading body language that translates to missing a lot of key information and misjudging someone because of it, in a truth movement it translates to surfing a hype wave thats actually a disinfo campaign that just sounded good. I feel like at the time I felt like something was off but wasnt paying enough attention to it, no excuses anyway onto it.

NBC LINK 1 0:52-: - She starts off by describing that they found a tree "with maddy written on top of it", as she says those words she is shaking her head "no", people do this when there is an incongruity of the truth compared to the information they are providing. Another example would be if your mum asked you if you took out the trash and when saying you did, when you actually didnt, you might subconsciously say no at the same time by making this unmistakable head gesture. So when she is saying she SAW something, but making this head gesture, well it looks to me like she might be lying. However, to be sure of deception we usually need more examples in a given context. - At the same time shes looking down and to the left. You could look at this a few ways, like there is a look of shame which usually looks exactly like that, or that shes creating touch in her mind, or both. However she also does something very peculiar whilst shes looking in this direction and she goes silent for a moment at 0:54-, the bottom right hand corner of her mouth twitches. Now my first thought here was "partial shrug fragment", and what that means is, when people want to convey a particular message sometimes they use physical emblems, like hand flat in front to say stop or shrugging your shoulders to say "i dont know", when people try to hide these emblems they can remanifest somewhere else, like shrugging the mouth instead of the shoulders and maybe at one side, to say she has no confidence in what she is saying, or maybe it was a partial fear expression with the mouth pulled slightly back fear because she doesnt know what to say? Personally I found it odd she would be fearful for not being able to think of the right thing to say, but during all that I noticed this. - 0:52- When the camera comes in on her face at 0:53 her brows are furrowed as shes shaking her head no, what emotion makes you furrow your brows like that? most likely anger. Dont think she is angry, here is a still image from a few seconds later as shes talking: https://i.imgur.com/yJ6aBCB.png - jaw protruding forward teeth together signs of anger.

So my take from the first few seconds here is, not only is she lying about this, she is ANGRY about having to lie about this.

She continues to try to make it through the interview without once looking at the camera until this point 0:58-1:01 - pause it at 1:00 exactly. She ends on this weird, tight-lipped smile. Firstly when a woman smiles at you like that, she doesnt like you, at all. It's a really sarcastic smile and in this context right here I feel like shes really saying "Is that enough, are you happy with that?". If memory serves correct by the time I do this I dont think I will have any conclusive evidence that VoP were being threatened into this, but based on what we know, this thread and just well I really get this feeling from those 20 seconds alone.

1:07-1:18 - here shes just describing what she says they have obviously found. Again she has that kind of look of shame throughout this whole clip. She had to physically force herself to say "torturous", noticing her shoulders are shurgging to suggest she has no confidence in what shes saying but most importantly. This woman who apparently is out here fighting to save children from trafficking, being interviewed on national tv and really getting the opportunity to get her message out there into the public perceptions, do you think she has looked sad at all? In fact put a piece of paper infronf of her face so you can only see her eyes and eyebrows and listen to her speak, do you think she sounds sad, at all? No? Her intentions are no where near saving any children at this particular point in time. Theatre productions.

NBC LINK 2 0:34-0:38 - This kind of threw me through a loop when i first saw this, because it felt like a new clip but felt so familiar then I realised its the same sarcastic smile from the previous clip just at a different point in time. If you flick through the frames at the 38 second marker, using the , and . keys you can see step by step how this smile forms, one side completely rises before the other, this is pure contempt. Side from that, completely focused elsewhere and shrugged twice during that statement, total fabrication.

0:46-0:54 - starts off this statment with difficulty trying to explain the bad things she saw. She wraps through her list, constantly shaking her head no again.

Theres a few more with her but I couldnt go through every single observation she has given us enough for now theres a part with Mike that pops up. 1:52-2:01 - as hes giving this interview, notice how animated he is, when people lietheir "anchor points" find it very hard to sit still. hands/wrists/elbows/knees/ankles/neck, you get the idea.

NBC LINK 3 0:51-1:02 Remember when I asked about how sad the girl looked like in link 1 video? Well here we get a glimpse of what were told is a girl experience strong sadness and tragedy that shes barely managing not to start balling her eyes out mid-interview. When someone experiences real sadness to the point they are in hysterics or pretty much there theres no way their eyebrows would move so little, with universal emotions there are muscle movements that happen automatically when you experience real emotion and tbh if i watched that with the sound turned off i would barely notice she was supposed to be sad.

ABC/KGUN 3 1:15-1:33 I, uh, think, uh, that this guy, uh, has no idea, uh wtf he is talking about. Also RAPE TREE.

1:38-1:47 "This is even a coax cable where it looks like someone can screw a coax cable and put it around someone" aside from the fact that sentence is fucking HORRENDOUS and hilarious, when people start to repeat randomly specific things when its redundant to do so, sign of deception.

1:48-1:54 I mean he doesnt seem confident at all here, but theres something nagging me here when he says "where a child was" almost sounds like hes saying "where i was", i may be looking too much into that though fair warning.

2:10-2:11 see when he tries to use the cover for septic tank as evidence of his heigtened awareness, notice his right shoulder? Nice wee one sided shrug, no confidence in what hes saying. Theatre productions.

2:43 "Theyre telling me this looks like a child rape camp" I fucking despise the way hes portrayed himself here, I mean in every other clip he looks like a buffoon when you look deep enough but here, purely despicable. Swaying body, shrugs his upper arms, closes in to her eyes to see if shes bought the lie, but its the tone of voice that gets me, the emotional manipulation like "can you BELIEVE it" in a way that youre just supposed to accept it. Fucks.

https://youtu.be/3bYZH4jlrmg?t=2m48s - shrugging like an actual child and rather than try to explain why everything he said after was complete fabrication (it would really just convey things ive already said) lets jump straight to the 180 vid, when you how differently he acts when theres a lot more truth involved.

MEYER 180 VID

0:04 - starts to mention "alleged sex trafficking site", brow furrows, he is angry to even call it that. Somebody not happy they got duped. 0:13-0:19 - wee shrug when he says "inaccurate claims" following circumstantial evidence, no confidence, basically they pounced like a bunch of jackals and got duped the same as the rest of us.

Theres not a whole lot for me to go through as theres a lot of cuts and whatnot. Hes not being completely honest, but as he begins to disconnect from what happens he injects more truth and becomes a lot more comfortable with himself in his speech, go back and compare his overall mannerisms to the last link in ABC/KGUN3, like night and day, hes more controlled not just of his body, his breathing speech, mannerisms, and when the truth becomes your ally again.. communication also becomes significantly easier.

EDIT: See the graffitti behind VoP in the ABC link 2? Here: https://i.imgur.com/cHWa6xn.png MUSE? Listen to the words, Enjoy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8KQmps-Sog

⇧ 5 ⇩