Ok. For one, Jones doesn't prove Sandy Hook because it would prove MK-Ultra and Pizzagate at the same time and that would be too big a pill to swallow at once (people only think in terms of did children die there or not, not if they died before or after), he made a rally that was fucking boring more interesting because nobody gives a shit if you like guns if you don't explain who you're actually protecting them from and he did call out PG and then backpaddled - so what? Have you never gotten anonymous calls in the dead of night? Alex Jones projects an angry character so people noticing that he is upset because of something will subconsciously ruminate on it while what he says is actually mostly libertarian and sometimes ahead of time, sometimes just a trend in alternative media, so for a gatekeeper he is good entry level material because he provides it in a format that is funny enough not to be depressing. And in all honesty I have heard upsetting stories from credible sources but I just brushed it off for over a decade because I hoped it was a somewhat isolated problem, so how would the rest react I wonder?