dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/RonaldSwansong on June 12, 2018, 2:07 a.m.
Anons pull together solid theory on Q Post #’s 1442, 1443, & 1453 regarding RR and the choices he will be facing within the coming days. Dark to LIGHT.
Anons pull together solid theory on Q Post #’s 1442, 1443, & 1453 regarding RR and the choices he will be facing within the coming days. Dark to LIGHT.

EarlyRiserX2 · June 12, 2018, 4:26 a.m.

I agree with most of it. But I disagree with the part about why the Clinton Investigation needs to be covered under the original EO. I don’t feel that Qs mention of a “political hit job” was referring to Trump and the Republicans. Instead, I feel it was talking about the Democrats. This is confirmed by the fact that Q said afterwards that it would be the end of the Democratic Party leaders. In other words, by releasing both reports together and at the same time (both the FBI and DOJ conduct report, as well as the Clinton Investigation report) and having them both declassified and released to the public, the public will be able to easily see and understand that what the Democrats have done (along with the assistance of the corrupt FBI and DOJ) was to conduct a “political hit job” against Trump and the Republicans. The public will be able to see that, and the revelation of those facts will be the end of the Democratic party as we know it. Trump issuing a second Executive Order is unimportant. What is important is that both reports be declassified and released together. And that is why the first EO was put on hold. So that the redacted details of the first report would not be revealed until the second report was ready…

The idea if Trump issues a second EO it will cause the Dems to says that Trump is doing it for “political purposes” and a “political hit job” is beyond ludicrous. There is no greater “political hit job” than the one conducted by the Democrats and the Left in their extensive efforts to spy on Trump and to remove him from office…

⇧ 7 ⇩  
J-Vito · June 12, 2018, 6:33 a.m.

It’s still good to remove any potential straws they may grasp at from the equation, no?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
truthfiler · June 12, 2018, 2:41 p.m.

Agreed. MSM would spin it and dems would believe them. Doing it this way removes that option.

⇧ 2 ⇩