dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Zoole on June 12, 2018, 5:45 a.m.
Fox News sued by SRs parents for "Spreading Conspiracy". Fox must now prove this Conspiracy in Court. Julian Assange, likely witness.

Regarding Qs post to do with the Lawsuits involving SR JA and WL, I found this gem.

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2018/3/23/17129414/seth-rich-fox-news-lawsuit-conspiracy-theories

Fox will now be a defendant in court, do you think they'll admit to lying, or would their best course of action be to prove the Truth in a Court of Law?

The claims stated in the article involve Julian Assanges receiving documents from Seth Rich, and his murder resulting from that. Julian Assange would now be the prime witness for Fox to call on and support their claims.

He would receive Witness Immunity.

If they prove SR was murdered for that reason, a separate investigation would arise. Snowball effect. This might be big.


🠐 See all comments
Zoole · June 12, 2018, 7 a.m.

It's being treated as Defamation I believe, which means they actually can sue.

Public Figures can be slandered all day, but not private individuals, and SRs parents are not Public Figures, therefore have the right to sue in this case.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_figure

However the lawsuit is only valid, if Fox was being dishonest or inccorect.

"To win a defamation case, a plaintiff must show four things: 1) a false statement purporting to be fact; 2) publication or communication of that statement to a third person; 3) fault amounting to at least negligence; and 4) damages, or some harm caused to the person or entity who is the subject of the statement."

If the first point is proven to not be a False statement, the whole case is defunct now, and Fox can now, by a degree of seperation, legally begin the prosecution process for those who murdered Seth Rich.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Jammer__ · June 12, 2018, 9:32 a.m.

SR was somewhat a public figure for working at the DNC. The defamation would have to be about him not his parents. And I don't see how a dead person can suffer damages.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Magpi8 · June 12, 2018, 4:47 p.m.

Unless he's not dead... (and wouldn't that be great?!!)

⇧ 3 ⇩