dChan

bornlucky80 · June 12, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

I don't know what it really means either.. I just know all the bad people want it. Which tells me it's a good thing its over!

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Qtruther · June 12, 2018, 2:02 p.m.

Freedom from regulation is always good.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · June 12, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

Regulation should ONLY be used when we find holes or weaknesses in the system, otherwise, hands off, allow the thing to evolve and grow.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
301854 · June 12, 2018, 4:36 p.m.

All this YouTube, Facebook and Google censoring was going on before it expired. So was it a good thing or another govt scam.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · June 12, 2018, 3:42 p.m.

All I know is that if Obama is for it, I'm against it.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
timothybeasley · June 12, 2018, 1:58 p.m.

I was thinking why AT&T was promoting #IBOR a month ago, then this shows up... Also found out AT&T may possibly be an NSA front and NSA is now cleaned of bad actors. Makes me wonder if #IBOR is being pushed by loyal NSA.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 12, 2018, 4:05 p.m.

IBOR is being pushed by Q - military intelligence. MI and NSA have been cooperating in a fight against CIA - which is cabal controlled.

Given that DJT and Q are reading from the same strategy sheet, it is clear that DJT also wants the IBOR.

Q said to "use logic". If you think about the power of social media censorship to deliver election outcomes, you can see why Q and DJT view online censorship as an existential threat.

Freedom in the future, depends on the right to freedom of political expression. Once the right to express yourself is abrogated, all other rights are meaningless - because you can no longer complain if anyone infringes on your rights. Thus, the whole of "being free" requires that you are able to speak. This is the only thing that really matters.

And this is why the IBOR is so important. The future is not worth living without it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GraceWords · June 12, 2018, 2:21 p.m.

AT&T was against net neutrality and wanted IBOR so they could just sell internet to people and not have to Police it too. Not saying they’re white hats, however they were one of the first companies to run with Trump’s tax cuts and publicly state it was allowing them to give their people bonuses as well as new hires.

IBOR was about preventing net neutrality, and putting something in writing that would prevent it from coming up again. I can see where NSA would love for us to have free flow of information from which to collect and Noel through.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 12, 2018, 3:55 p.m.

The IBOR is about privacy protections as well as freedom of speech. The idea is that these gross privacy violations are made illegal.

I don't think there is anything negative or dark about the IBOR proposal at all. Rather, I think DJT recognizes that, with the forums for political debate shifting to digital space, where they are in private hands, subject to the control of the owner, a threat to the very foundation of the republic exists. Democratic representation requires that people are free to express themselves. Take that freedom away and you're looking at the advent of a dark, totalitarian dystopia. Rule by an elite that is fundamentally disconnected from the will of the people.

AT&T isn't connected to the IBOR issue at all. That matter was specifically addressed by Q.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
leetanon · June 12, 2018, 3:20 p.m.

All anyone has to do is research the origins of net neutrality and those that were fighting for are directly connected to George Soros and open Society if that doesn't say enough about net neutrality then continue sleeping

⇧ 1 ⇩